This is a roBERTa-base model trained on ~58M tweets and finetuned for sentiment analysis with the TweetEval benchmark. This model is suitable for English (for a similar multilingual model, see XLM-T). - Reference Paper: _TweetEval_ (Findings of EMNLP 2020). - Git Repo: Tweeteval official repository. New! We just released a new sentiment analysis model trained on more recent and a larger quantity of tweets. See twitter-roberta-base-sentiment-latest and TweetNLP for more details.
This is a RoBERTa-base model trained on ~124M tweets from January 2018 to December 2021, and finetuned for sentiment analysis with the TweetEval benchmark. The original Twitter-based RoBERTa model can be found here and the original reference paper is TweetEval. This model is suitable for English. - Reference Paper: TimeLMs paper. - Git Repo: TimeLMs official repository. This sentiment analysis model has been integrated into TweetNLP. You can access the demo here.
This is a RoBERTa-large model trained on 154M tweets until the end of December 2022 (from original checkpoint, no incremental updates). A base model trained on the same datais available here. These 154M tweets result from filtering 220M tweets obtained exclusively from the Twitter Academic API, covering every month between 2018-01 and 2022-12. Filtering and preprocessing details are available in the TimeLMs paper. Below, we provide some usage examples using the standard Transformers interface. For another interface more suited to comparing predictions and perplexity scores between models trained at different temporal intervals, check the TimeLMs repository.
This is a XLM-Roberta-base model trained on ~198M multilingual tweets, described and evaluated in the reference paper. To evaluate this and other LMs on Twitter-specific data, please refer to the main repository. A usage example is provided below. ```bibtex @inproceedings{barbieri-etal-2022-xlm, title = "{XLM}-{T}: Multilingual Language Models in {T}witter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyond", author = "Barbieri, Francesco and Espinosa Anke, Luis and Camacho-Collados, Jose", booktitle = "Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference", month = jun, year = "2022", address = "Marseille, France", publisher = "European Language Resources Association", url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.27", pages = "258--266", abstract = "Language models are ubiquitous in current NLP, and their multilingual capacity has recently attracted considerable attention. However, current analyses have almost exclusively focused on (multilingual variants of) standard benchmarks, and have relied on clean pre-training and task-specific corpora as multilingual signals. In this paper, we introduce XLM-T, a model to train and evaluate multilingual language models in Twitter. In this paper we provide: (1) a new strong multilingual baseline consisting of an XLM-R (Conneau et al. 2020) model pre-trained on millions of tweets in over thirty languages, alongside starter code to subsequently fine-tune on a target task; and (2) a set of unified sentiment analysis Twitter datasets in eight different languages and a XLM-T model trained on this dataset.", }
This is a multilingual XLM-roBERTa-base model trained on ~198M tweets and finetuned for sentiment analysis. The sentiment fine-tuning was done on 8 languages (Ar, En, Fr, De, Hi, It, Sp, Pt) but it can be used for more languages (see paper for details). - Paper: XLM-T: A Multilingual Language Model Toolkit for Twitter. - Git Repo: XLM-T official repository. This model has been integrated into the TweetNLP library.
This model is a fine-tuned version of cardiffnlp/twitter-xlm-roberta-base on the `cardiffnlp/tweet_sentiment_multilingual (all)` via `tweetnlp`. Training split is `train` and parameters have been tuned on the validation split `validation`. Following metrics are achieved on the test split `test` (link). - F1 (micro): 0.6931034482758621 - F1 (macro): 0.692628774202147 - Accuracy: 0.6931034482758621
**Paper:** ASR Language Resources for Faroese The "wav2vec2-large-xlsr-53-faroese-100h" is an acoustic model suitable for Automatic Speech Recognition in Faroese. It is the result of fine-tuning the model "facebook/wav2vec2-large-xlsr-53" with 100 hours of Faroese data released by the Ravnur Project (https://maltokni.fo/en/) from the Faroe Islands. The specific dataset used to create the model is called "Ravnursson Faroese Speech and Transcripts" and it is available at http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12537/276.
`azzurra-voice` is a state-of-the-art, highly expressive text-to-speech (TTS) model for the Italian language, developed by Cartesia. This model is the first release from the **Azzurra Project**, our initiative to build private, personal, and empathetic AI that feels Italian not just in language, but in culture, warmth, and presence. `azzurra-voice` was trained on thousands of hours of high-quality, diverse Italian speech, capturing a wide range of accents, prosodies, and conversational styles from across Italy. This model is released to empower researchers, developers, and makers to build more inclusive, local, and human-centered AI applications.
**A 27B model with its whole trained context window, at q8_0 KV precision, on one RTX 4070 12 GB. 78 tok/s of new text at 32k tokens of context (175 on code), 69 at 64k, 61 at 112k, and the window keeps going to 262k. Lossless speculative decoding at every depth. A server that answers the requests agents and apps actually send. One command on Windows.** This is PrismML's Ternary Bonsai 2 27B (1.58-bit ternary `PTQ1_0`, 5.9 GB, Apache 2.0), the same weights, nothing re-quantized, with its MTP draft head grafted back on (byte-identical trunk, proof below) and the serving stack from github.com/professorpalmer/bonsai-ada-surgery: a tiered KV cache that puts the first ~119k positions in VRAM and the rest in pinned system RAM with bit-identical output, MTP drafting that pays at every depth, harness-proofing for the apps that send `effort: "high"` or tiny output caps, and an optional server-side layer (exact API cards, an API check, a sandboxed Python tool) that lifts the model's coding and agentic scores without touching the weights. Measured 2026-10-08 (`bench/depth_table.sh`), a fresh prompt at each depth: 400-token greedy answers with the default drafting (lookup + MTP head); new text = an essay, code = a Python module; prefill = cumulative for the whole prompt; display on the CPU's iGPU. Every number has a receipt in the repository (`docs/Q8_FULL_CONTEXT.md`, `docs/RECEIPTS.md`, `docs/QUALITY.md`).
--- base_model: motheecreator/vit-Facial-Expression-Recognition tags: - generated_from_trainer - facial-expression-recognition - image-classification - vision-transformer metrics: - accuracy model-index: - name: vit-Facial-Expression-Recognitio results: [] --- This model is based on a Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture fine-tuned for facial expression recognition. The associated research, *Facial Expression Recognition with CNNs and Vision Transformers: Full Images, Landmarks, and a Hybrid Method on FER-2013, FER+ and RAF-DB*, investigates different approaches to facial expression recognition using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs).
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
COST EXPLORER
Great models. Clear costs.
Cost analysis
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
1 M = 1 million tokens · USD Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
MODEL HANDBOOK
Understand before you choose
Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Do open weights mean free commercial use?+
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.
