MODEL PROFILE

twitter-xlm-roberta-base

cardiffnlp · twitter-xlm-roberta-base

This is a XLM-Roberta-base model trained on ~198M multilingual tweets, described and evaluated in the reference paper. To evaluate this and other LMs on Twitter-specific data, please refer to the main repository. A usage example is provided below. ```bibtex @inproceedings{barbieri-etal-2022-xlm, title = "{XLM}-{T}: Multilingual Language Models in {T}witter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyond", author = "Barbieri, Francesco and Espinosa Anke, Luis and Camacho-Collados, Jose", booktitle = "Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference", month = jun, year = "2022", address = "Marseille, France", publisher = "European Language Resources Association", url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.27", pages = "258--266", abstract = "Language models are ubiquitous in current NLP, and their multilingual capacity has recently attracted considerable attention. However, current analyses have almost exclusively focused on (multilingual variants of) standard benchmarks, and have relied on clean pre-training and task-specific corpora as multilingual signals. In this paper, we introduce XLM-T, a model to train and evaluate multilingual language models in Twitter. In this paper we provide: (1) a new strong multilingual baseline consisting of an XLM-R (Conneau et al. 2020) model pre-trained on millions of tweets in over thirty languages, alongside starter code to subsequently fine-tune on a target task; and (2) a set of unified sentiment analysis Twitter datasets in eight different languages and a XLM-T model trained on this dataset.", }

Context windowNot disclosed
Input → OutputText → Text
Model weightsNot verified
Profile updated2026/11/2 19:16:51
OVERVIEW

Model overview

This is a XLM-Roberta-base model trained on ~198M multilingual tweets, described and evaluated in the reference paper. To evaluate this and other LMs on Twitter-specific data, please refer to the main repository. A usage example is provided below. ```bibtex @inproceedings{barbieri-etal-2022-xlm, title = "{XLM}-{T}: Multilingual Language Models in {T}witter for Sentiment Analysis and Beyond", author = "Barbieri, Francesco and Espinosa Anke, Luis and Camacho-Collados, Jose", booktitle = "Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference", month = jun, year = "2022", address = "Marseille, France", publisher = "European Language Resources Association", url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.27", pages = "258--266", abstract = "Language models are ubiquitous in current NLP, and their multilingual capacity has recently attracted considerable attention. However, current analyses have almost exclusively focused on (multilingual variants of) standard benchmarks, and have relied on clean pre-training and task-specific corpora as multilingual signals. In this paper, we introduce XLM-T, a model to train and evaluate multilingual language models in Twitter. In this paper we provide: (1) a new strong multilingual baseline consisting of an XLM-R (Conneau et al. 2020) model pre-trained on millions of tweets in over thirty languages, alongside starter code to subsequently fine-tune on a target task; and (2) a set of unified sentiment analysis Twitter datasets in eight different languages and a XLM-T model trained on this dataset.", }

Key features

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

Limitations & considerations

Sources are insufficient to establish specific limitations. Verify task performance, latency, data policies, licensing and version lifecycle.

PRICING & COST

Source prices & cost analysis

Prices vary by channel, region and configuration. Channel quotes are listed independently and are not treated as a single official provider price.

Source / channelInputOutputBilling unitCollected at
No verified prices yet. Check the source channel.

Estimate monthly base token costs

—

Estimates exclude cache discounts, tiered pricing, multimodal surcharges, web search, taxes and additional reasoning output.

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

Public benchmarks & run configuration

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

View full indexed rankings →

Frequently asked questions

Do open weights permit free commercial use?

Not necessarily. Check the version license, commercial conditions and usage policies. Self-hosting incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Are these real-time billing prices?

These are timestamped source snapshots, not live billing prices. Check the channel for current versions, regions, discounts and billing methods.

Sources & traceability

许可证:来源未披露,须进一步核验。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。