AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
41,857 model profiles6816 providers / publishers45 capability categories464 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 1732

Discover models worth your attention

GGUF builds of `abhishek085/spark-s1-4b-v6` for **llama.cpp**, **Ollama**, LM Studio, Jan and other GGUF runtimes. Part of Open Spark Jev, an open-source project of the Nokast AI community. > **This is not a chat model.** `spark-s1` is a System-1 *decision* model: given a state and a question with a fixed menu of options, the > answer is the probability distribution over the option letters at the **first** generated token. Chatting with it (`ollama run ...`) only > ever produces a single letter. Use it through the logprob recipe below or through the Open Spark Jev gateway. Measured on 200 shuffled rows of the project's locked held-out split (`v5_test_locked`), llama.cpp `llama-server` (CUDA, build `38a5b42`), `/v1/completions` with `top_logprobs=20`, calibrated temperature applied client-side. Ollama 0.40.2 with the Q8_0 file gave the same 99.5% / 0.900. This is a parity check against the HF model, not a new benchmark; the model's own evaluation is on the base model card.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is a fine-tuned version of bert-tiny on the emotion balanced dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.1809 - Accuracy: 0.9354 TinyBERT is 7.5 times smaller and 9.4 times faster on inference compared to its teacher BERT model (while DistilBERT is 40% smaller and 1.6 times faster than BERT). The model has been trained on 89_754 examples split into train, validation and test. Each label was perfectly balanced in each split. This model is not as accurate as the distilbert-emotion-balanced one because the focus was on speed, which can lead to misinterpretation of complex sentences. Despite this, its performance is quite good and should be more than sufficient for most use cases.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is fine-tuned from **`indobenchmark/indobert-base-p1`** for binary sentiment classification (Positive/Negative) on Indonesian text. This model is intended for binary sentiment classification tasks in Indonesian language texts. It predicts whether a given text expresses positive or negative sentiment. The model was trained on a dataset of Indonesian text reviews from Play Store applications. The dataset was labeled for binary sentiment analysis (Positive and Negative). It contains an equal distribution of positive and negative examples to ensure balanced learning.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

The model was fine-tuned for Sentiment Analysis task on _Financial PhraseBank_ dataset. Experiments show that this model outperforms the general BERT and other financial domain-specific models. More details on `FinancialBERT`'s pre-training process can be found at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358284785_FinancialBERT_-_A_Pretrained_Language_Model_for_Financial_Text_Mining FinancialBERT model was fine-tuned on Financial PhraseBank, a dataset consisting of 4840 Financial News categorised by sentiment (negative, neutral, positive).

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

FRIDA-Decisions

ai-forever

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Cadence-Fast

ai4bharat

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

IndicNER

ai4bharat

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is the fine-tuned model of "dbmdz/bert-base-turkish-cased" using a reviewed version of well known Turkish NER dataset (https://github.com/stefan-it/turkish-bert/files/4558187/nerdata.txt). Pls refer "https://huggingface.co/transformers/_modules/transformers/pipelines/token_classification.html" for entity grouping with aggregation_strategy parameter. Evaluation results with the test sets proposed in "Küçük, D., Küçük, D., Arıcı, N. 2016. Türkçe Varlık İsmi Tanıma için bir Veri Kümesi ("A Named Entity Recognition Dataset for Turkish"). IEEE Sinyal İşleme, İletişim ve Uygulamaları Kurultayı. Zonguldak, Türkiye." paper.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Jev-Omni

akhilaaa3

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗