google_gemma-4-E4B-it-GGUF
indiansatoshi基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
IndoBERT was trained and evaluated by Bryan Wilie\*, Karissa Vincentio\*, Genta Indra Winata\*, Samuel Cahyawijaya\*, Xiaohong Li, Zhi Yuan Lim, Sidik Soleman, Rahmad Mahendra, Pascale Fung, Syafri Bahar, Ayu Purwarianti.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
IndoBERT was trained and evaluated by Bryan Wilie\*, Karissa Vincentio\*, Genta Indra Winata\*, Samuel Cahyawijaya\*, Xiaohong Li, Zhi Yuan Lim, Sidik Soleman, Rahmad Mahendra, Pascale Fung, Syafri Bahar, Ayu Purwarianti.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
IndoBERT is a state-of-the-art language model for Indonesian based on the BERT model. The pretrained model is trained using a masked language modeling (MLM) objective and next sentence prediction (NSP) objective. IndoBERT was trained and evaluated by Bryan Wilie\*, Karissa Vincentio\*, Genta Indra Winata\*, Samuel Cahyawijaya\*, Xiaohong Li, Zhi Yuan Lim, Sidik Soleman, Rahmad Mahendra, Pascale Fung, Syafri Bahar, Ayu Purwarianti.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
IndoBERT is a state-of-the-art language model for Indonesian based on the BERT model. The pretrained model is trained using a masked language modeling (MLM) objective and next sentence prediction (NSP) objective. IndoBERT was trained and evaluated by Bryan Wilie\*, Karissa Vincentio\*, Genta Indra Winata\*, Samuel Cahyawijaya\*, Xiaohong Li, Zhi Yuan Lim, Sidik Soleman, Rahmad Mahendra, Pascale Fung, Syafri Bahar, Ayu Purwarianti.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
We trained the model for 2.4M steps (180 epochs) with the final perplexity over the development set being 3.97 (similar to English BERT-base). This IndoBERT was used to examine IndoLEM - an Indonesian benchmark that comprises of seven tasks for the Indonesian language, spanning morpho-syntax, semantics, and discourse. The paper is published at the 28th COLING 2020. Please refer to https://indolem.github.io for more details about the benchmarks.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
Fajri Koto, Jey Han Lau, and Timothy Baldwin. _IndoBERTweet: A Pretrained Language Model for Indonesian Twitter with Effective Domain-Specific Vocabulary Initialization_. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (**EMNLP 2021**), Dominican Republic (virtual). In this paper, we show that initializing domain-specific vocabulary with average-pooling of BERT subword embeddings is more efficient than pretraining from scratch, and more effective than initializing based on word2vec projections. We crawl Indonesian tweets over a 1-year period using the official Twitter API, from December 2019 to December 2020, with 60 keywords covering 4 main topics: economy, health, education, and government. We obtain in total of **409M word tokens**, two times larger than the training data used to pretrain IndoBERT. Due to Twitter policy, this pretraining data will not be released to public.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
This is the model built for the project Multilingual Speech Recognition for Indonesian Languages. It is a fine-tuned facebook/wav2vec2-large-xlsr-53 model on the Indonesian Common Voice dataset, High-quality TTS data for Javanese - SLR41, and High-quality TTS data for Sundanese - SLR44 datasets. We also provide a live demo to test the model. The model can be evaluated as follows on the Indonesian test data of Common Voice.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
This is the model for Wav2Vec2-Large-XLSR-Indonesian, a fine-tuned facebook/wav2vec2-large-xlsr-53 model on the Indonesian Common Voice dataset. When using this model, make sure that your speech input is sampled at 16kHz. The model can be evaluated as follows on the Indonesian test data of Common Voice. The Common Voice `train`, `validation`, and synthetic voice datasets were used for training.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
**A 552B-parameter MoE running on one gaming PC: RTX 4090 (24 GB) + 90 GB RAM + NVMe** Runs on **Xolotl** (formerly Strata-DSV4.1), an engine built for exactly this model and this class of machine, on top of Strata. **Builds:** **V4** (`v4/`, 163 GB, recommended) · V3 (`v3/`, 163 GB) · V2 (`v2/`, 152 GB)
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
Runs on **Xolotl** (formerly Strata-DSV4.1), an engine built for exactly this model and this class of machine, on top of Strata. > **Update 2026-10-17:** the engine is now **Xolotl** (Strata-DSV4.1 renamed; > old links redirect) - one tree that also serves GLM-5.3-Flash and the Qwen3.8 models. Measured through the server > with thinking on (32K budget): **HumanEval 21/21, tool calls 10/10, agentic 3/3, decode 26.8 tok/s**. Agent turns got > cheaper: small-turn prefill -12% (bit-identical logits) and a **conversation-adaptive expert arena** (on by default) > that moves the conversation's NVMe experts into RAM between turns: -21..-30% NVMe reads, a +180-token turn on a 6K > context 8.5 -> 7.6 s. Build with `build-xolotl` (below). > **Update 2026-10-15:** the engine's defaults are now the **coding-safe route bias ×0.5** (HumanEval 20/21 and tool calls > 10/10, vs 16/21 at the old full bias) with DSpark speculative decoding **in the server** (exact speculative sampling), > a confidence-gated verify (prose 9.5 → 17.3, code 18.8 → 25.5, python 26.6 → 29.1 tok/s), a **bit-exact 4-bit KV cache** > (`--kv-fp4`, +1.1 GiB VRAM at 512K) and ~2× faster conversational turns (+1000-token turn 40 → 20 s at 512K). > Details: the repo README "Latest".
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
可以调整厂商、分类或输入输出条件;新模型正持续收录。
调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。
使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。
先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。
不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。
榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。