从语言到影像，从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本，
为你的下一个想法，找到合适的智能引擎。
This is a GGUF-quantized version of the **Krea-2-Turbo** diffusion transformer, produced with **ByteShape's ShapeLearn**, which learns the optimal datatype per tensor to maintain high quality even at very low bitlengths. Five sizes are available, from **14.31 GB (8.93 bpw)** down to **6.26 GB (3.91 bpw)**. All variants generate high-quality images. These files run in **ComfyUI** via the ComfyUI-GGUF extension.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
This is a GGUF-quantized version of the **Qwen-Image-2512** diffusion transformer, produced with **ByteShape's ShapeLearn**, which learns the optimal datatype per tensor to maintain high quality even at very low bitlengths. Six sizes are available, from **16.87 GB (6.61 bpw)** down to **7.77 GB (3.04 bpw)**. All variants generate high-quality images. > Looking for more speed? We also publish a **vLLM-Omni** build of the same model with optimized Humming kernels, roughly **2-3x faster** per step. See byteshape/Qwen-Image-2512-Humming.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
This is a GGUF-quantized version of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B produced with **ByteShape's ShapeLearn**, which learns the optimal datatype per tensor to maintain high quality even at very low bitlengths. To learn more about ShapeLearn and to see detailed benchmarks across GPUs, CPUs, and even the Raspberry Pi, please visit our blog. Pick a model from the tables below and click **Get llama.cpp command** to get a ready-to-run command with all the correct sampling parameters for this model.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
This is a GGUF-quantized version of Qwen3.6-35B-A3B with **Multi-Token Prediction (MTP)** support, produced with **ByteShape's ShapeLearn**, which learns the optimal datatype per tensor to maintain high quality even at very low bitlengths. MTP allows the model to predict multiple tokens per forward pass, accelerating decoding on GPUs by accepting speculative tokens that match what the base model would have produced. These models are optimized for **GPU-only** inference. Pick a model from the table below and click **Get llama.cpp command** to get a ready-to-run command with all the correct sampling parameters for this model.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
This is a GGUF-quantized version of Qwen3.8-27B produced with **ByteShape's ShapeLearn**, which learns the optimal datatype per tensor to maintain high quality even at very low bitlengths. This release replaces our earlier ShapeLearn-Lite quantizations of Qwen3.8-27B. Every model here has been through our **full multi-benchmark evaluation suite**, covering math, coding, general knowledge, instruction following and agentic tool use in both thinking and instruct modes, scored against the BF16 baseline. To learn more about ShapeLearn and to see detailed benchmarks across GPUs, please visit our blog.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
No-Thinking · PI Tune · MTP · GGUF 🪐 Qwen3.6-27B-MTP-pi-tune A 4-bit QLoRA SFT Multi-Token Prediction tune of Qwen3.6-27B fine-tuned for no-thinking agentic coding through a PI-style harness. Packaged as llama.cpp-compatible GGUF for local agent loops. 🧠 27B Dense Foundation 🚫 No-Thinking Tuned ⚡ MTP Speculative Decoding 🛠️ Coding · DevOps · Agents 📦 llama.cpp GGUF 🖼️ Multi-Modal Compatible 🪟 256k Native · 1M Max Context > [!TIP] > For the strongest Pi-style coding-agent behavior, use the reasoning-trained release: `bytkim/Qwen3.6-27B-MTP-pi-reasoning-GGUF`. See the technical writeup for the broader evaluation context. This no-thinking tune remains useful when you specifically want the lower-latency direct / instruct path.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
**Qwen3.8-27B-pi** builds on Qwen3.8-27B for coding work in the Pi agent harness. It is tailored to the loop of reading a repository, editing files, running tools, and responding to their feedback. The aim is more completed work with less generated text, while retaining the base model's familiar interface. Fine-tuned for the Pi agent harness, the model is designed to work through coding tasks as an iterative process: inspect the code, make a change, check the result, and use tool feedback to guide the next step. Adjustable reasoning effort lets you balance responsiveness with deeper problem-solving, from focused edits to more involved debugging and implementation work. - **Built for Pi:** Fine-tuned for the everyday coding loop—reading repositories, editing files, running tools, and working through feedback in the Pi harness—with an emphasis on turning plans into working, checked implementations. - **Curated coding experience:** Supervised fine-tuning on filtered, successful Pi sessions helps the model learn complete coding workflows, rather than isolated answers or code snippets, including how to adapt to existing environments and check results against task requirements. - **Task quality matters:** Development also included reviewing, repairing, and exploring more demanding coding tasks—with a focus on clear requirements and checks that distinguish working solutions from incorrect ones. - **Refined through reinforcement learning:** A second training stage pairs verified task outcomes with a custom reasoning-efficiency reward built on GRPO, encouraging successful low- and medium-effort solutions to reason more economically while leaving xhigh focused on correctness. - **Available in practical formats:** Choose a deployment format that fits your hardware, including GGUF quantizations calibrated using complete Pi coding sessions.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
可以调整厂商、分类或输入输出条件；新模型正持续收录。
调整月度 Token 用量，直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。
使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照；不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费，请以来源的当前报价为准。
先区分输入、输出和缓存价格，再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费，不能直接与 Token 单价比较。
不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。
榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本，再选择模型。
