AI NEWS · 模型情报站发现能力边界,让每一次选择更有依据 ↗基础档案先收录 · 缺失资料持续补齐
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 模型探索,从这里开始

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。

热门探索
84,991 款模型档案13202 家厂商 / 发布者45 个能力分类465 款有可比报价 · 30 款有公开评测
T文本生成▧图像生成▷视频生成⌘代码生成◖语音合成♫音乐生成⬡3D 建模▤文档分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

探索 AI 模型 84991

为你发现值得关注的模型

SigLIP2-giant

AvitoTech

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

分类待补充
输入 待核验→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

qwen3.5-4b-gguf

avnishrai1

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 图像
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

*GISTEmbed: Guided In-sample Selection of Training Negatives for Text Embedding Fine-tuning* The model is fine-tuned on top of the sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 using the MEDI dataset augmented with mined triplets from the MTEB Classification training dataset (excluding data from the Amazon Polarity Classification task). The model does not require any instruction for generating embeddings. This means that queries for retrieval tasks can be directly encoded without crafting instructions.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 向量
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

*GISTEmbed: Guided In-sample Selection of Training Negatives for Text Embedding Fine-tuning* The model is fine-tuned on top of the BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5 using the MEDI dataset augmented with mined triplets from the MTEB Classification training dataset (excluding data from the Amazon Polarity Classification task). The model does not require any instruction for generating embeddings. This means that queries for retrieval tasks can be directly encoded without crafting instructions.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 向量
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

*GISTEmbed: Guided In-sample Selection of Training Negatives for Text Embedding Fine-tuning* The model is fine-tuned on top of the BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5 using the MEDI dataset augmented with mined triplets from the MTEB Classification training dataset (excluding data from the Amazon Polarity Classification task). The model does not require any instruction for generating embeddings. This means that queries for retrieval tasks can be directly encoded without crafting instructions.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 向量
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

4-bit weight quantisation of Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B, built so the model fits a single **24 GB** consumer GPU. > Note on the `qwen3_5` tag: Qwen3.8 is implemented with the Qwen3.5 > architecture (`model_type: qwen3_5`, `Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration`), so > the Hub derives that family tag automatically — the upstream > `Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B` repo carries it too. This is Qwen **3.8**. Text-only serving reclaims the vision encoder cache (~5k extra KV tokens on a 24 GB card):

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本 · 图像→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

分类待补充
输入 待核验→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

M2-2B

AwareLiquid

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

分类待补充
输入 待核验→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-300k is a fine-tuned Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 language model that supports input contexts up to 320k tokens. MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-300k can be deployed on a single AWS `g5.48xlarge` instance using serving frameworks such as vLLM, Sagemaker DJL endpoint, and others. Similarities and differences beween MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-300k and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 are summarized below: _InfiniteBench is a cutting-edge benchmark tailored for evaluating the capabilities of language models to process, understand, and reason over super long contexts (100k+ tokens)_. We therefore evaluated MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-300k, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2, Llama-3-8B-Instruct-262k, and Llama3-70B-1M on InfiniteBench. The InfiniteBench authors also evaluated SOTA proprietary and open-source LLMs on InfiniteBench. We thus combined both results in the table below. The 12 evaluation tasks are summarized below (as per InfiniteBench)) | Task Name | Context | # Examples | Avg Input Tokens | Avg Output Tokens | Description | | -------------------- | ------------- | ---------- | ---------------- | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | En.Sum | Fake Book | 103 | 171.5k | 1.1k | Summarization of a fake book created with core entity substitution. | | En.QA | Fake Book | 351 | 192.6k | 4.8 | Free-form question answering based on the fake book. | | En.MC | Fake Book | 229 | 184.4k | 5.3 | Multiple choice questions derived from the fake book. | | En.Dia | Script | 200 | 103.6k | 3.4 | Identification of talkers in partially anonymized scripts. | | Zh.QA | New Book | 175 | 2068.6k | 6.3 | Question answering on a set of newly collected books. | | Code.Debug | Code Document | 394 | 114.7k | 4.8 | Finding which function in a code repo contains an crashing error (in multiple choice form). | | Code.Run | Synthetic | 400 | 75.2k | 1.3 | Simulating execution of multiple simple, synthetic functions. | | Math.Calc | Synthetic | 50 | 43.9k | 43.9k | Calculations involving super-long arithmetic equations. | | Math.Find | Synthetic | 350 | 87.9k | 1.3 | Finding special integers in a lengthy list. | | Retrieve.PassKey | Syntheti

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model, presented in Scaling Context, Not Parameters: Training a Compact 7B Language Model for Efficient Long-Context Processing, is a Long-Context LLM that supports 524,288 tokens in its context. `MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-512k` was trained on Mistral-7B Instruct-v0.2, and can be deployed using various serving frameworks like vLLM and Amazon SageMaker's DJL endpoint. Please refer to our GitRepo for deployment and inference examples. We evaluated `MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-512k` on three long-context benchmarks. For each benchmark, we deployed the `MegaBeam-Mistral-7B-512k` model with vLLM (v0.5.1) on an EC2 instance and obtained LLM responses through the OpenAI API provided by vLLM. The Arize-ai NIAH varies the target random number and introduces a random city for each question, requiring the LLM to extract the random number from various selected context locations.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

SONICS: Synthetic Or Not - Identifying Counterfeit Songs ICLR 2025 [Poster] The recent surge in AI-generated songs presents exciting possibilities and challenges. These innovations necessitate the ability to distinguish between human-composed and synthetic songs to safeguard artistic integrity and protect human musical artistry. Existing research and datasets in fake song detection only focus on singing voice deepfake detection (SVDD), where the vocals are AI-generated but the instrumental music is sourced from real songs. However, these approaches are inadequate for detecting contemporary end-to-end artificial songs where all components (vocals, music, lyrics, and style) could be AI-generated. Additionally, existing datasets lack music-lyrics diversity, long-duration songs, and open-access fake songs. To address these gaps, we introduce SONICS, a novel dataset for end-to-end Synthetic Song Detection (SSD), comprising over 97k songs (4,751 hours) with over 49k synthetic songs from popular platforms like Suno and Udio. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of modeling long-range temporal dependencies in songs for effective authenticity detection, an aspect entirely overlooked in existing methods. To utilize long-range patterns, we introduce SpecTTTra, a novel architecture that significantly improves time and memory efficiency over conventional CNN and Transformer-based models. For long songs, our top-performing variant outperforms ViT by 8% in F1 score, is 38% faster, and uses 26% less memory, while also surpassing ConvNeXt with a 1% F1 score gain, 20% speed boost, and 67% memory reduction. - 📄 **Paper** - 🎵 **Dataset** - 🔬 **ArXiv** - 💻 **GitHub**

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 音频→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

The recent surge in AI-generated songs presents exciting possibilities and challenges. These innovations necessitate the ability to distinguish between human-composed and synthetic songs to safeguard artistic integrity and protect human musical artistry. Existing research and datasets in fake song detection only focus on singing voice deepfake detection (SVDD), where the vocals are AI-generated but the instrumental music is sourced from real songs. However, these approaches are inadequate for detecting contemporary end-to-end artificial songs where all components (vocals, music, lyrics, and style) could be AI-generated. Additionally, existing datasets lack music-lyrics diversity, long-duration songs, and open-access fake songs. To address these gaps, we introduce SONICS, a novel dataset for end-to-end Synthetic Song Detection (SSD), comprising over 97k songs (4,751 hours) with over 49k synthetic songs from popular platforms like Suno and Udio. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of modeling long-range temporal dependencies in songs for effective authenticity detection, an aspect entirely overlooked in existing methods. To utilize long-range patterns, we introduce SpecTTTra, a novel architecture that significantly improves time and memory efficiency over conventional CNN and Transformer-based models. For long songs, our top-performing variant outperforms ViT by 8% in F1 score, is 38% faster, and uses 26% less memory, while also surpassing ConvNeXt with a 1% F1 score gain, 20% speed boost, and 67% memory reduction. .hf-button { display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 6px; padding: 6px 12px; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; color: white; border-radius: 6px; text-decoration: none; } .hf-button img { height: 18px; }

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 音频→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗
COST EXPLORER

好模型,也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型,再做选择

选型与常见问题
API 价格应该怎么比较?+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重,就代表可以免费商用吗?+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一,就是最适合我的模型吗?+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。

AI NEWS · 从信息到选择

资讯看趋势,工具提效率,模型筑可能。

探索 AI 资讯 ↗发现 AI 工具 ↗