AI NEWS · 模型情报站发现能力边界,让每一次选择更有依据 ↗基础档案先收录 · 缺失资料持续补齐
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 模型探索,从这里开始

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。

热门探索
55,421 款模型档案8882 家厂商 / 发布者45 个能力分类464 款有可比报价 · 30 款有公开评测
T文本生成▧图像生成▷视频生成⌘代码生成◖语音合成♫音乐生成⬡3D 建模▤文档分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

探索 AI 模型 55396

为你发现值得关注的模型

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

分类待补充
输入 待核验→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

r17-m133

abacada

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

分类待补充
输入 待核验→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

> In JavaScript, functions are first-class values, which means you can assign them to variables, pass them as arguments to other functions, and even nest them inside other functions. This leads to concise and expressive code. > > Here's an example of a simple recursive function that calculates the factorial of a given number in JavaScript: > > > > Now, let's try to write an equivalent code snippet in ANSI-C with similar functionality: > > > > As you can see, the ANSI-C code becomes more verbose and has several disadvantages compared to JavaScript: > > 1. Need to define a maximum recursion depth using a constant or an array index, which can lead to hardcoded limits and potential stack overflow issues. > 2. The use of preprocessor directives (#define) for defining functions and macros can make the code less readable and harder to understand. > 3. The lack of closures in ANSI-C requires using static variables or passing arguments as arguments to nested functions, making the code more verbose and less concise. > yaml dtype: float16 merge_method: passthrough slices: - sources: - layer_range: [0, 8] model: mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 - sources: - layer_range: [4, 12] model: mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 - sources: - layer_range: [8, 16] model: mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 - sources: - layer_range: [12, 20] model: mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 - sources: - layer_range: [16, 24] model: mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 - sources: - layer_range: [20, 28] model: mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 - sources: - layer_range: [24, 32] model: mistralai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

bigyi-15b

abacusai

I recently made bigstral-12b and then I saw this new awesome model yi-9b and decided to make an embiggened version. Here is a recipe for Mai Tai:\n\n1: > 3 parts rum, 2: 3 parts pineapple juice, 3: half a cup of lime juice, 4: 6 to 8 fresh or frozen pineapple chunks, 5: crushed ice. > Mix all ingredients except ice and pour into glasses with ice. Garnish with a pineapple slice.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model was built using the Smaug recipe for improving performance on real world multi-turn conversations applied to meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct. This version of Smaug uses new techniques and new data compared to Smaug-72B, and more information will be released later on. For now, see the previous Smaug paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13228.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

The model did achieve an improvement in TruthfulQA over `cookinai/CatMacaroni-Slerp` and GSM8K over `mncai/mistral-7b-dpo-v5` which was the goal of the merge leading to an average score that was a better than both. It is unclear why the TruthfulQA metric is still meaningfully lower than the base `mncai/mistral-7b-dpo-v5`.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model is a finetune of jondurbin's excellent bagel model. This model has not utilised any form of merging. We created Smaug-34B-v0.1 using a new fine-tuning technique, DPO-Positive (DPOP), and new pairwise preference versions of ARC, HellaSwag, and MetaMath (as well as other existing datasets). We introduce the technique and the full training details in our new paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13228. We show that on datasets in which the edit distance between pairs of completions is low (such as in math-based datasets), standard DPO loss can lead to a reduction of the model's likelihood of the preferred examples, as long as the relative probability between the preferred and dispreferred classes increases. Using these insights, we design DPOP, a new loss function and training procedure which avoids this failure mode. Surprisingly, we also find that DPOP outperforms DPO across a wide variety of datasets and downstream tasks, including datasets with high edit distances between completions.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

We recently released Smaug-72B-v0.1 which has taken first place on the Open LLM Leaderboard by HuggingFace. It is the first open-source model to surpass an average score of 80%. Smaug-72B is finetuned directly from moreh/MoMo-72B-lora-1.8.7-DPO and is ultimately based on Qwen-72B. We created Smaug-72B-v0.1 using a new fine-tuning technique, DPO-Positive (DPOP), and new pairwise preference versions of ARC, HellaSwag, and MetaMath (as well as other existing datasets). We introduce the technique and the full training details in our new paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13228.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model was built using a new Smaug recipe for improving performance on real world multi-turn conversations applied to meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct. The model outperforms Llama-3-70B-Instruct substantially, and is on par with GPT-4-Turbo, on MT-Bench (see below). EDIT: Smaug-Llama-3-70B-Instruct is the top open source model on Arena-Hard currently! It is also nearly on par with Claude Opus - see below.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗
COST EXPLORER

好模型,也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型,再做选择

选型与常见问题
API 价格应该怎么比较?+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重,就代表可以免费商用吗?+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一,就是最适合我的模型吗?+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。

AI NEWS · 从信息到选择

资讯看趋势,工具提效率,模型筑可能。

探索 AI 资讯 ↗发现 AI 工具 ↗