d1-2B
LiquidAI基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
d1-3B is a 3B parameter **decision model** built on LFM2.5-VL-3B. You give it a state (text, JSON, images, or a mix) and a set of questions. It returns calibrated, typed answers in **one forward pass with zero output tokens**. - **Best decision model under 10B on the Decision Index 0.2.1**: 48.57, ahead of every 4B and 9B model and of Decider 35B-A3B (47.11). - **Multimodal**: images and text in the same state. It scores 74.1 on 11 public image benchmarks (LFM2.5-VL-3B: 73.9). - **Fast**: 8 ms a decision on an NVIDIA RTX 4090, 9 ms on an AMD MI325X, 30 ms on an Apple M5 Pro. Find more information about open d1 in our blog post.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
d1-3B is a decision model developed by Liquid AI: it answers named, typed questions over a state (text, JSON or images) in one forward pass, with no generated tokens. Find more details in the original model card: https://huggingface.co/LiquidAI/d1-3B
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
d1-Omni-2B is a decision model for text, pictures, and audio, built on LFM3-Omni-2B. It returns calibrated answers in one forward pass, without generating tokens. llama.cpp answers `noul`, `choice` and `score` questions over a state (text or JSON), pictures, a video, audio clips, and questions written or spoken. Videos are read as their frames, and video input needs `ffmpeg` in `PATH`. Multiple choice (`"multiple": true`), extraction, estimates and boxes are not supported yet. A question is read in one batch, so `-b` and `-ub` must hold its state and media. A picture takes at most half of `-ub`: 8192 keeps the full budget of 4096 tokens per picture, smaller values lower it.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
d1-omni-600M is a 600M parameter **decision model** built on LFM2.5-Encoder-350M. You give it a state (text or JSON, with images or a voice clip) and a set of named questions. It returns typed answers with **zero output tokens**: every answer is read directly from the model's distribution over the options, with no generation and no parsing. - **Vision-language**: text and images (tiled for large frames, several images per state) in a single forward pass. - **Audio-language**: text and up to 30 s of speech in a single forward pass. - **Edge-sized**: 587M parameters: a 381M shared trunk and decision head, a 94M vision encoder and a 112M audio encoder. Every modality runs the same trunk weights. Find more information about open d1 in our blog post.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
d1-omni-600M is a decision model developed by Liquid AI: it answers named, typed questions over a state (text, JSON, images or audio) in one forward pass, with no generated tokens. A question is read in one batch, so `-b` and `-ub` must hold it: 4096 covers any image and states of a few thousand tokens, raise them up to 16384 for longer states. The state can be `null` when the images or the audio are the whole state. A request carries images or one audio clip (up to 30 s), not both.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
LFM2 is a new generation of hybrid models developed by Liquid AI, specifically designed for edge AI and on-device deployment. It sets a new standard in terms of quality, speed, and memory efficiency.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
LFM2 is a new generation of hybrid models developed by Liquid AI, specifically designed for edge AI and on-device deployment. It sets a new standard in terms of quality, speed, and memory efficiency.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
可以调整厂商、分类或输入输出条件;新模型正持续收录。
调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。
使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。
先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。
不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。
榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。