la_core_web_sm
latincy基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
ThinkPRM-1.5B is a generative Process Reward Model (PRM) based on the R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B architecture. It is fine-tuned to perform step-by-step verification of reasoning processes (like mathematical solutions) by generating an explicit verification chain-of-thought (CoT) that involves labeling every step. It is designed to be highly data-efficient, requiring significantly less supervision data than traditional discriminative PRMs while achieving strong performance. ThinkPRM-1.5B provides step-level verification scores by generating natural language critiques and correctness judgments for each step in a given solution prefix. It leverages the underlying reasoning capabilities of the base Large Reasoning Model (LRM) and enhances them through fine-tuning on a small (1K examples) dataset of synthetically generated verification CoTs. These synthetic CoTs were produced by prompting QwQ-32B-Preview and filtered against ground-truth step labels from the PRM800K dataset to ensure quality. The model uses a standard language modeling objective, making it interpretable and allowing it to scale process verification compute by generating longer or multiple verification CoTs. It demonstrated superior performance compared to LLM-as-a-judge and discriminative PRM baselines (based on the same R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B model but trained on ~100x more labels) on benchmarks including ProcessBench, MATH-500, AIME '24, GPQA-Diamond, and LiveCodeBench.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B (vendor: `ornith-ai`) is a ~35B mixture-of-experts model with ~3B activated parameters per token (≈70 GB in bf16), 262,144-token context, built on top of Qwen3.5/Gemma4 by continued pretraining + reinforcement self-improvement. It is a *reasoning model*: its assistant turns open with a ` … ` chain-of-thought block, and it emits ` ` blocks for function calling. Vendor card: https://huggingface.co/ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B The uncensored artifacts on HF were produced by the community with **Heretic** (https://github.com/p-e-w/heretic, v1.4.0 lineage) — the fully automated abliteration tool. Abliteration is a *training-free* modification: it estimates the "refusal direction" in the model's activation space and projects that direction out of selected weight matrices, disabling refusal behaviour without any fine-tuning, then validates against a behavioral test suite and keeps the best pass. Heretic therefore changes a small fraction of weights only; the vendor's reasoning/tool-calling behaviour and general capability are otherwise preserved as far as the trial's KL-bounded search allows. 1. **No Heretic run of our own.** Running Heretic on this 35B model locally (4× V100, CPU-only tooling) is a multi-day job with no guarantee of a good pass. Instead we reused the best public Heretic output: `SC117/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-Heretic-MTP-APEX-GGUF`, tier `I-Quality` — verified genuine Heretic 1.4.0 output (Trial 62), dequantised ≈ 5.29 bpw. The vendor's own BF16 repo (`ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF` / `ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B`) is *not* abliterated, and no BF16 Heretic checkpoint was ever published, so every public uncensor of this model is one Heretic generation downstream of a full-precision master. 2. **The source is already quantized.** The abliterated master was never released at bf16; the best public artifact is a carefully-made quant at ~5.3 bpw. Our builds are therefore **second-generation quants** (Heretic abliteration → 5.29 bpw master → our 3.0/3.5 bpw), which costs some quality versus a hypothetical GSQ-RCO built straight from the vendor's bf16. That is the highest-fidelity uncensored pipeline available for this model as of today.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
Model and tokenizer files for the InLegalBERT model from the paper Pre-training Transformers on Indian Legal Text. For building the pre-training corpus of Indian legal text, we collected a large corpus of case documents from the Indian Supreme Court and many High Courts of India. The court cases in our dataset range from 1950 to 2019, and belong to all legal domains, such as Civil, Criminal, Constitutional, and so on. In total, our dataset contains around 5.4 million Indian legal documents (all in the English language). The raw text corpus size is around 27 GB. This model is initialized with the LEGAL-BERT-SC model from the paper LEGAL-BERT: The Muppets straight out of Law School. In our work, we refer to this model as LegalBERT, and our re-trained model as InLegalBERT. We further train this model on our data for 300K steps on the Masked Language Modeling (MLM) and Next Sentence Prediction (NSP) tasks.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
可以调整厂商、分类或输入输出条件;新模型正持续收录。
调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。
使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。
先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。
不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。
榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。