AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,995 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 84995

Discover models worth your attention

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

eliza-1

elizaos

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

jiwo-0.8b

eljiwo

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

cryptobert

ElKulako

For academic reference, cite the following paper: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10223689 CryptoBERT is a pre-trained NLP model to analyse the language and sentiments of cryptocurrency-related social media posts and messages. It was built by further training the vinai's bertweet-base language model on the cryptocurrency domain, using a corpus of over 3.2M unique cryptocurrency-related social media posts. (A research paper with more details will follow soon.) The model was trained on the following labels: "Bearish" : 0, "Neutral": 1, "Bullish": 2 CryptoBERT's sentiment classification head was fine-tuned on a balanced dataset of 2M labelled StockTwits posts, sampled from ElKulako/stocktwits-crypto.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

propella-1 is a family of small multilingual LLMs that annotate text documents across six categories: core content, classification, quality & value, audience & purpose, safety & compliance, and geographic relevance. The annotations can be used to filter, select, and curate LLM training data at scale. *Disclaimer: This is a research project, not an official ellamind product. For production-ready evaluation solutions, check out elluminate.* propella-1 models evaluate documents across 18 properties organized into six categories: | Category | Property | Short Description | |----------|----------|-------------| | **Core Content** | Content Integrity | Completeness and technical quality of the content | | | Content Ratio | Proportion of content vs. navigation/UI elements | | | Content Length | Amount of substantive content | | **Classification** | One-Sentence Description | Ultra-short neutral description of the document | | | Content Type | Functional structure and purpose | | | Business Sector | Industry domain relevance | | | Technical Content | Type and intensity of specialized knowledge | | **Quality & Value** | Content Quality | Overall writing and presentation quality | | | Information Density | Ratio of valuable information to redundancy | | | Educational Value | Potential for teaching and learning | | | Reasoning Indicators | Presence of logical reasoning and analysis | | **Audience & Purpose** | Audience Level | Target sophistication level | | | Commercial Bias | Commercial influence on objectivity | | | Time-Sensitivity | How content value changes over time | | **Safety & Compliance** | Content Safety | Presence of inappropriate or harmful content | | | PII Presence | Contains personally identifiable information | | **Geographic** | Regional Relevance | Primary regional/cultural context | | | Country Relevance | Specific country relevance |

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

propella-1 is a family of small multilingual LLMs that annotate text documents across six categories: core content, classification, quality & value, audience & purpose, safety & compliance, and geographic relevance. The annotations can be used to filter, select, and curate LLM training data at scale. *Disclaimer: This is a research project, not an official ellamind product. For production-ready evaluation solutions, check out elluminate.* propella-1 models evaluate documents across 18 properties organized into six categories: | Category | Property | Short Description | |----------|----------|-------------| | **Core Content** | Content Integrity | Completeness and technical quality of the content | | | Content Ratio | Proportion of content vs. navigation/UI elements | | | Content Length | Amount of substantive content | | **Classification** | One-Sentence Description | Ultra-short neutral description of the document | | | Content Type | Functional structure and purpose | | | Business Sector | Industry domain relevance | | | Technical Content | Type and intensity of specialized knowledge | | **Quality & Value** | Content Quality | Overall writing and presentation quality | | | Information Density | Ratio of valuable information to redundancy | | | Educational Value | Potential for teaching and learning | | | Reasoning Indicators | Presence of logical reasoning and analysis | | **Audience & Purpose** | Audience Level | Target sophistication level | | | Commercial Bias | Commercial influence on objectivity | | | Time-Sensitivity | How content value changes over time | | **Safety & Compliance** | Content Safety | Presence of inappropriate or harmful content | | | PII Presence | Contains personally identifiable information | | **Geographic** | Regional Relevance | Primary regional/cultural context | | | Country Relevance | Specific country relevance |

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Krea2_Checkpoints

EllaPriest45

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

LTX2.5_base

EllaPriest45

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

MinimaxH3_base

EllaPriest45

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Qwen3.8_27B

EllaPriest45

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Wan2.2_Checkpoints

EllaPriest45

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗