Qween3_4B_deepthinking_finetune
dilipnswamy基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
An abliterated (uncensored) Flint: RecursiveSI's Flint 40B-A2.5B with its refusal direction removed, for security research and coding work: exploit analysis, malware triage, detection engineering, CTFs and red-team tooling that the original model often declines. **Summary:** held-out MITRE ATT&CK refusals 15% → 0% (n=100, Q8_0). No significant drop on HumanEval+, MBPP+, GSM8K, MMLU-Pro, CyberMetric or WMDP-cyber (paired, same items). KL divergence from the original on harmless prompts: 0.0146. Builds: BF16, GGUF (Q8_0 to Q3_K_M), NVFP4 for NVIDIA Blackwell, MLX 4-bit for Apple silicon. **Not sure?** Take the GGUF `Q4_K_M` (24 GB). It runs in llama.cpp and in apps built on it, including LM Studio (its llama.cpp runtime 2.63.0 includes Flint). The MLX builds are for Mac users who already run mlx-lm.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Beware that this model is trained on a dataset collected about 2 years ago. Since then, there is a remarkable progress in generating deepfake images with common AI tools, resulting in a significant concept drift. To mitigate that, I urge you to retrain the model using the latest available labeled data. As a quick-fix approach, simple reducing the threshold (say from default 0.5 to 0.1 or even 0.01) of labelling image as a fake may suffice. However, you will do that at your own risk, and retraining the model is the better way of handling the concept drift.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Returns person celebrity-style attractiveness (0 to 1) based on facial image with about 83% accuracy.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Beware that this model is trained on a dataset collected about 3 years ago. Since then, there is a remarkable progress in generating deepfake images with common AI tools, resulting in a significant concept drift. To mitigate that, I urge you to retrain the model using the latest available labeled data. As a quick-fix approach, simple reducing the threshold (say from default 0.5 to 0.1 or even 0.01) of labelling image as a fake may suffice. However, you will do that at your own risk, and retraining the model is the better way of handling the concept drift.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
See https://www.kaggle.com/code/dima806/age-group-image-classification-vit for details.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Returns with about 98.7% accuracy whether the face belongs to man or woman based on face image. See https://www.kaggle.com/code/dima806/man-woman-face-image-detection-vit for more details.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.