DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-CRACK-NVFP4
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗DISCOVER & COMPARE
Explore AI models 84991
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-JANG-CRACK
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗Gemma-4-26B-A4B-JANG_4M-CRACK
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗Gemma-4-31B-JANG_4M-CRACK
dealignai**Abliterated Gemma 4 31B Dense — 60 layers, hybrid sliding/global attention, multimodal VL** > **Recommended: Run in vMLX** for best experience including thinking mode support, repetition penalty, and vision capabilities. - **Improved abliteration**: Higher quality refusal vector extraction - **Thinking-ON stability**: Clean thinking cycle — no more degenerate loops - **Same compliance**: 93.7% HarmBench - **Architecture-aware**: Tuned for Gemma 4's hybrid attention design
Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗Gemma-4-31B-JANG_4M-Uncensored
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗GLM-5.3-ABLITERATED-NVFP4
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗GLM-5.3-CYBERSECURITY-FP8
dealignaia **CRACK** release by dealignai · Twitter @dealignai > [!IMPORTANT] > **Runtime notes** — field-tested on 8× DGX Spark GB10 by @0xMagnus (discussion): > > - **`reasoning_effort` only honors `"low"` and `"high"`.** Every other value — `off`, `medium`, `max`, unset, or an unquoted YAML `off:` (parses as boolean `false`) — falls through to `max`. There is no way to disable reasoning on this checkpoint; pass `"low"` for minimum. > - **On FP8, prefer `low` for agent / tool-loop use.** At `high`/`max` the model can spend the whole `max_tokens` budget inside ` ` and return zero answer tokens (finish=`length`); sampling params (temp 0 + rep 1.05, temp 0.7 / top-p 0.95) do not rescue it. It is budget exhaustion, not a loop. If you must run `high`/`max`, give `max_tokens ≥ 8000`. > - **Reasoning text is in `message.reasoning`**, not `message.reasoning_content`. > - **MTP:** non-functional on stock vLLM, but reported working on ciprianveg's B12X sparse-MLA vLLM fork with `--draft-attention-backend B12X_MLA_SPARSE` (+48% decode on coding prompts). > - **1M context via decode-context-parallel is closed** on `glm_moe_dsa` in vLLM today (DSA indexer `k_cache` is replicated across DCP ranks while MLA KV is sharded → `page size is not divisible by target page size and cannot be padded` for `fp8_ds_mla`). Practical TP8 H200 ceiling: ~131K w/MTP, ~160K w/o. Pipeline-parallel (PP2 × TP4) profiles fine, but the MTP draft does not implement `SupportsPP`. **This is a CYBERSECURITY-DOMAIN CRACK of GLM-5.3-FP8 — not a general-purpose uncensor.**
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗GLM-5.3-Flash-CYBERSECURITY-W4A16
dealignai> [!IMPORTANT] > **Serving note — read before your first request (vLLM / SGLang with a reasoning parser).** > > - **`reasoning_effort` only accepts `"low"` and `"high"`.** Anything else — `medium`, `xhigh`, > `off`, or omitting it — silently resolves to **`max`**, the deepest mode. Template line: > `reasoning_effort ... in ['low','high'] else 'max'`. > - **At `max`, a small `max_tokens` returns an EMPTY reply.** The model spends the whole budget > inside ` ` and you get `finish_reason="length"` with `content=""`. In multi-turn the empty > turn poisons the history and the conversation does not recover. Measured: `max` + `max_tokens > 2000` dies from turn ~4; `max` + `6000` is clean; `low` and `high` are clean at 2000. > **It is budget exhaustion, not a loop** — sampling changes do not rescue it. > - **Do NOT pass `enable_thinking`.** This template has no such variable (only `clear_thinking` and > `reasoning_effort`). Passing it — or a top-level `reasoning_effort: "none"` — turns the parser off > while the model still thinks, dumping raw reasoning into `content`. > - **Reasoning is returned in `message.reasoning`**, not `message.reasoning_content` > (vLLM renamed the output field; the input side still accepts both). > - `clear_thinking` must be nested inside `chat_template_kwargs` — a top-level key is ignored. > > > Use `"high"` for hard tasks; if you want `max`, give it `max_tokens >= 6000`. > > > **Video and image parameters — measured, because several are accepted then silently ignored.** > > - 🔴 **`media_io_kwargs.video.fps` must stay BELOW the clip's own frame rate.** Requesting a value > at or above it makes the placeholder builder count 3x the real tokens and **kills the engine**: > `ValueError: Attempted to assign N = N multimodal tokens to 3N placeholders` -> `EngineDeadError`, > server down until restarted. Upstream: vLLM #55644 / #55647. `fps: 2` is the safe, accurate choice. > - **`max_frames` and `num_frames` are not interchangeable across builds.** On vLLM nightly > `max_frames` is honoured and `num_frames` ignored; on the older `0.1.dev*` line it is the exact > reverse. A client that sets only one silently gets full-rate sampling on the other build
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗GLM-5.3-Flash-UNCENSORED-FP8
dealignai> [!IMPORTANT] > **Serving note — read before your first request (vLLM / SGLang with a reasoning parser).** > > - **`reasoning_effort` only accepts `"low"` and `"high"`.** Anything else — `medium`, `xhigh`, > `off`, or omitting it — silently resolves to **`max`**, the deepest mode. Template line: > `reasoning_effort ... in ['low','high'] else 'max'`. > - **At `max`, a small `max_tokens` returns an EMPTY reply.** The model spends the whole budget > inside ` ` and you get `finish_reason="length"` with `content=""`. In multi-turn the empty > turn poisons the history and the conversation does not recover. Measured: `max` + `max_tokens > 2000` dies from turn ~4; `max` + `6000` is clean; `low` and `high` are clean at 2000. > **It is budget exhaustion, not a loop** — sampling changes do not rescue it. > - **Do NOT pass `enable_thinking`.** This template has no such variable (only `clear_thinking` and > `reasoning_effort`). Passing it — or a top-level `reasoning_effort: "none"` — turns the parser off > while the model still thinks, dumping raw reasoning into `content`. > - **Reasoning is returned in `message.reasoning`**, not `message.reasoning_content` > (vLLM renamed the output field; the input side still accepts both). > - `clear_thinking` must be nested inside `chat_template_kwargs` — a top-level key is ignored. > > > Use `"high"` for hard tasks; if you want `max`, give it `max_tokens >= 6000`. > > > **Video and image parameters — measured, because several are accepted then silently ignored.** > > - 🔴 **`media_io_kwargs.video.fps` must stay BELOW the clip's own frame rate.** Requesting a value > at or above it makes the placeholder builder count 3x the real tokens and **kills the engine**: > `ValueError: Attempted to assign N = N multimodal tokens to 3N placeholders` -> `EngineDeadError`, > server down until restarted. Upstream: vLLM #55644 / #55647. `fps: 2` is the safe, accurate choice. > - **`max_frames` and `num_frames` are not interchangeable across builds.** On vLLM nightly > `max_frames` is honoured and `num_frames` ignored; on the older `0.1.dev*` line it is the exact > reverse. A client that sets only one silently gets full-rate sampling on the other build. Set > `fps`, which every build honours. > - **Pixel controls: use `mm_processor_kwargs.max_image_tokens` / `min_image_tokens`.** > `max_pixels`, `min_pixels`, `size` and `detail` return HTTP 200 and
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗GLM-5.3-Flash-UNCENSORED-NVFP4
dealignai> [!IMPORTANT] > **Serving note — read before your first request (vLLM / SGLang with a reasoning parser).** > > - **`reasoning_effort` only accepts `"low"` and `"high"`.** Anything else — `medium`, `xhigh`, > `off`, or omitting it — silently resolves to **`max`**, the deepest mode. Template line: > `reasoning_effort ... in ['low','high'] else 'max'`. > - **At `max`, a small `max_tokens` returns an EMPTY reply.** The model spends the whole budget > inside ` ` and you get `finish_reason="length"` with `content=""`. In multi-turn the empty > turn poisons the history and the conversation does not recover. Measured: `max` + `max_tokens > 2000` dies from turn ~4; `max` + `6000` is clean; `low` and `high` are clean at 2000. > **It is budget exhaustion, not a loop** — sampling changes do not rescue it. > - **Do NOT pass `enable_thinking`.** This template has no such variable (only `clear_thinking` and > `reasoning_effort`). Passing it — or a top-level `reasoning_effort: "none"` — turns the parser off > while the model still thinks, dumping raw reasoning into `content`. > - **Reasoning is returned in `message.reasoning`**, not `message.reasoning_content` > (vLLM renamed the output field; the input side still accepts both). > - `clear_thinking` must be nested inside `chat_template_kwargs` — a top-level key is ignored. > > > Use `"high"` for hard tasks; if you want `max`, give it `max_tokens >= 6000`. > > > **Video and image parameters — measured, because several are accepted then silently ignored.** > > - 🔴 **`media_io_kwargs.video.fps` must stay BELOW the clip's own frame rate.** Requesting a value > at or above it makes the placeholder builder count 3x the real tokens and **kills the engine**: > `ValueError: Attempted to assign N = N multimodal tokens to 3N placeholders` -> `EngineDeadError`, > server down until restarted. Upstream: vLLM #55644 / #55647. `fps: 2` is the safe, accurate choice. > - **`max_frames` and `num_frames` are not interchangeable across builds.** On vLLM nightly > `max_frames` is honoured and `num_frames` ignored; on the older `0.1.dev*` line it is the exact > reverse. A client that sets only one silently gets full-rate sampling on the other build
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗GLM-5.3-UNCENSORED-FP8
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗GLM-5.3-UNCENSORED-NVFP4
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗GPT-OSS-120B-MLX-CRACK
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗Laguna-XS-2.1-CRACK-GGUF
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL-UNCENSORED
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗MiniCPM-V-4.7-1B-CRACK-GGUF
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗MiniCPM-V-4.7-35B-A3B-CRACK-GGUF
dealignaiRefusal-direction–ablated GGUF of `openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-35B-A3B`, the 35B-A3B Qwen3.5-moe-text (hybrid GatedDeltaNet + Full-Attention + 256 routed experts + 1 shared expert) multimodal model. Surgery removes the model's refusal direction from **all three residual-stream writer tiers** of the Qwen3.5 hybrid architecture — the SSM output path is the critical tier that single-tier surgeries miss on this architecture. Multimodal (16× + 4× projectors) and DSpark speculative-decoding paths are preserved. HarmBench-240 (standard + contextual + copyright splits), MMLU-200 (balanced subjects, logit-eval), multi-turn 5-scenario coherence, harsh-10 hot categories. Multimodal verified on synthetic image (number `7342` + red square + blue circle).
Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗MiniCPM5-2B-CRACK-JANG_8M
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗MiniMax-M2.5-UNCENSORED-JANG_2L
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗MiniMax-M2.7-JANGTQ-CRACK
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗Mistral-Small-4-119B-JANG_2L-CRACK
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗Muse-Glimmer-30B-CRACK-GGUF
dealignai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗Nanbeige4.3-33B-UNCENSORED-GGUF
dealignai**Standard dense Llama-family 33B · 52 layers · 7168 hidden · GQA 56Q/8KV · think on/off · 512K context** > **UNCENSORED** = refusal-removed GGUF build of **Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B**. Three quants in one place: **Q6_K (25.3 GB)**, **Q4_K_M (18.7 GB)**, **IQ2_XXS (8.7 GB)**. All ship with a fresh matching importance matrix (imatrix) over 1M tokens of mixed code / reasoning / agentic / terminal / conversation calibration content, with exact source-tokenizer parity against the pinned llama.cpp runtime. Native thinking mode (on/off) preserved from the original chat template. > Research artifact for alignment work. This model answers requests the base refuses, including harmful ones. **Do not deploy to end users without separate downstream safety controls.**
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗No matching models
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
COST EXPLORER
Great models. Clear costs.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
MODEL HANDBOOK
Understand before you choose
How should API prices be compared?+
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Do open weights mean free commercial use?+
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.