AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,991 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 84991

Discover models worth your attention

V3 is the third and final release of our decensored Hemmingway-1, and the first that stays decensored with **thinking on**. V2 (trial 208) removed refusals only with thinking off: at low reasoning effort it refused 60 of 100 harmful prompts, and 87 at medium. V3 (trial 124) was searched and selected on thinking-mode refusals. It refuses 2 of 100 at both low and medium effort. We also ran a 60-prompt blind comparison against the original, modelled on the method in Hemmingway-1's own model card. The judge found no measurable loss in writing quality, and judged V3's writing more likely to be a person's in 72% of matchups. Base model: Altworld/Hemmingway-1 — 27B, Qwen3.8 lineage, 64 decoder layers plus one MTP block, 262,144-token context.

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This is the vision variant of V3 Final. The language model is unchanged from it: all 866 transformer tensors are byte-identical (SHA-256 verified), so every text evaluation in the V3 Final card carries over verbatim. The variant adds only the vision encoder and projector from Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B (333 tensors), plus the multimodal processor and chat template. V3 is the third and final release of our decensored Hemmingway-1, and the first that stays decensored with **thinking on**. V2 (trial 208) removed refusals only with thinking off: at low reasoning effort it refused 60 of 100 harmful prompts, and 87 at medium. V3 (trial 124) was searched and selected on thinking-mode refusals. It refuses 2 of 100 at both low and medium effort. We also ran a 60-prompt blind comparison against the original, modelled on the method in Hemmingway-1's own model card. The judge found no measurable loss in writing quality, and judged V3's writing more likely to be a person's in 72% of matchups.

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

nopo4d

bralani01

This work presents **NoPo4D**, the first feed-forward system that jointly addresses dynamic content, multi-view input, and unknown camera poses in a single pass. In pursuit of pose-free 4D reconstruction, NoPo4D yields two key insights: 🏆 NoPo4D consistently outperforms prior feed-forward baselines across four multi-view dynamic benchmarks (ExoRecon, Immersive Light Field, Kubric, and N3DV). With an optional post-optimization stage, it surpasses per-scene optimization methods while running orders of magnitude faster. For full installation instructions (including the custom Depth Anything 3 backbone and optional `torch-scatter`), please refer to the NoPo4D GitHub repository.

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

fietje-2-gguf

BramVanroy

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

There is **no universal current default launcher** across the historical profiles retained in this card. For a new deployment, do not infer a default from an older section: The portable r17 package becomes the recommended downloadable path only after it repeats the end-to-end graph, task, 260K retrieval, and numerical gates on the corrected dual-ABI build. An immutable five-fresh-boot acceptance panel plus a factorial G64-Q-only follow-up compared the r17 FP8 MLA reader paths. Lower KLD is better.

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

MuseCan

BreadAi

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗