AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,838 model profiles13099 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 84838

Discover models worth your attention

BERT_Review

activebus

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

adakajuan

adakajuan

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

peeLoraV1

Adam3DX

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is a fine-tuned version of bert-tiny on the emotion balanced dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.1809 - Accuracy: 0.9354 TinyBERT is 7.5 times smaller and 9.4 times faster on inference compared to its teacher BERT model (while DistilBERT is 40% smaller and 1.6 times faster than BERT). The model has been trained on 89_754 examples split into train, validation and test. Each label was perfectly balanced in each split. This model is not as accurate as the distilbert-emotion-balanced one because the focus was on speed, which can lead to misinterpretation of complex sentences. Despite this, its performance is quite good and should be more than sufficient for most use cases.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is a fine-tuned version of vit-base-patch16-384 on around 25_000 images (drawings, photos...). It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.0937 - Accuracy: 0.9654 ** New [07/30] **: I created a new ViT model specifically to detect NSFW/SFW images for stable diffusion usage (read the disclaimer below for the reason): **AdamCodd/vit-nsfw-stable-diffusion**. **Disclaimer**: This model wasn't made with generative images in mind! There is no generated image in the dataset used here, and it performs significantly worse on generative images, which will require another ViT model specifically trained on generative images. Here are the model's actual scores for generative images to give you an idea: - Loss: 0.3682 (↑ 292.95%) - Accuracy: 0.8600 (↓ 10.91%) - F1: 0.8654 - AUC: 0.9376 (↓ 5.75%) - Precision: 0.8350 - Recall: 0.8980

Visual QAOpen weights
Input Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

beans-deit-tiny

Adamix3003

This model is a fine-tuned version of facebook/deit-tiny-patch16-224 on the AI-Lab-Makerere/beans dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.0988 - Accuracy: 0.9699 - F1 Macro: 0.9699 The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 5e-05 - train_batch_size: 32 - eval_batch_size: 64 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Use OptimizerNames.ADAMW_TORCH_FUSED with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments - lr_scheduler_type: linear - num_epochs: 5 - mixed_precision_training: Native AMP

Input Image→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is a fine-tuned version of facebook/deit-tiny-patch16-224 on the AI-Lab-Makerere/beans dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.0619 - Accuracy: 0.9850 - F1 Macro: 0.9850 The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 5e-05 - train_batch_size: 32 - eval_batch_size: 64 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Use OptimizerNames.ADAMW_TORCH_FUSED with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments - lr_scheduler_type: linear - num_epochs: 5 - mixed_precision_training: Native AMP

Input Image→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗