swinv2-base-patch4-window16-256
Microsoft基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Swin Transformer v2 model pre-trained on ImageNet-1k at resolution 256x256. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer v2 did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Swin Transformer v2 model pre-trained on ImageNet-21k and fine-tuned on ImageNet-1k at resolution 256x256. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer v2 did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Swin Transformer v2 model pre-trained on ImageNet-1k at resolution 256x256. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer v2 did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
Swin Transformer v2 model pre-trained on ImageNet-1k at resolution 256x256. It was introduced in the paper Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution by Liu et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Swin Transformer v2 did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Swin Transformer is a type of Vision Transformer. It builds hierarchical feature maps by merging image patches (shown in gray) in deeper layers and has linear computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention only within each local window (shown in red). It can thus serve as a general-purpose backbone for both image classification and dense recognition tasks. In contrast, previous vision Transformers produce feature maps of a single low resolution and have quadratic computation complexity to input image size due to computation of self-attention globally.
Table Transformer (DETR) model trained on PubTables1M. It was introduced in the paper PubTables-1M: Towards Comprehensive Table Extraction From Unstructured Documents by Smock et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Table Transformer did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Table Transformer is equivalent to DETR, a Transformer-based object detection model. Note that the authors decided to use the "normalize before" setting of DETR, which means that layernorm is applied before self- and cross-attention.
Table Transformer (DETR) model trained on PubTables1M. It was introduced in the paper PubTables-1M: Towards Comprehensive Table Extraction From Unstructured Documents by Smock et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Table Transformer did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Table Transformer is equivalent to DETR, a Transformer-based object detection model. Note that the authors decided to use the "normalize before" setting of DETR, which means that layernorm is applied before self- and cross-attention.
Table Transformer (TATR) model trained on PubTables1M and FinTabNet.c. It was introduced in the paper Aligning benchmark datasets for table structure recognition by Smock et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Table Transformer did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Table Transformer is equivalent to DETR, a Transformer-based object detection model. Note that the authors decided to use the "normalize before" setting of DETR, which means that layernorm is applied before self- and cross-attention.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
TAPEX was proposed in TAPEX: Table Pre-training via Learning a Neural SQL Executor by Qian Liu, Bei Chen, Jiaqi Guo, Morteza Ziyadi, Zeqi Lin, Weizhu Chen, Jian-Guang Lou. The original repo can be found here. TAPEX (**Ta**ble **P**re-training via **Ex**ecution) is a conceptually simple and empirically powerful pre-training approach to empower existing models with *table reasoning* skills. TAPEX realizes table pre-training by learning a neural SQL executor over a synthetic corpus, which is obtained by automatically synthesizing executable SQL queries. TAPEX is based on the BART architecture, the transformer encoder-encoder (seq2seq) model with a bidirectional (BERT-like) encoder and an autoregressive (GPT-like) decoder.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
**Repository:** https://github.com/microsoft/TRELLIS.2 **Project Page:** https://microsoft.github.io/trellis.2 **TRELLIS.2** is a state-of-the-art large 3D generative model designed for high-fidelity **image-to-3D** generation. It leverages a novel "field-free" sparse voxel structure termed **O-Voxel** and a large-scale flow-matching transformer (4 Billion parameters).
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.