AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
85,003 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 85003

Discover models worth your attention

opendecider-nano

manjunathshiva

**Open, calibrated System 1 decision model.** Give it a **state** (text, email, ticket or JSON) and **typed questions** (`choice`, `score`, `noul`); it returns a calibrated probability for every option in a single forward pass: **17 ms on an NVIDIA L40S, 18 ms on an Apple M4 Max, ~9 ms per question batched**. ~400M parameters, Apache-2.0. It never generates text, so there is nothing to parse and nothing to hallucinate. **Ahead of Laya like for like on typed-decisions: 0.796**, against 0.766 for Laya's typed-decisions checkpoint (+0.030, 95% CI +0.014 to +0.044), both fine-tuned on its train split. TypeSafe Jev scores 0.754 there zero-shot (measured through TypeSafe's own API): a reference, not a head-to-head. **Documentation: manjunathshiva.github.io/opendecider**: getting started, choosing a model, guides for serving, LM Studio, Ollama and vLLM and automating the confident decisions, plus the Python and HTTP API reference.

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

GGUF builds of OpenDecider-small, the 4B OpenDecider decision model, for **LM Studio**, **Ollama** and anything else built on llama.cpp. Best for decisions it has never seen: the best general accuracy and calibration of the 4B models (zero-shot on typed-decisions). A decision model answers typed questions (`choice`, `score`, yes/no) about any text or JSON with a probability for every option, instead of generating text. The opendecider package builds the exact prompt the model was trained on and reads the option probabilities from the server's token log-probabilities. On typed-decisions (2,000 questions), the Q8_0 build gives the same top answer as the full-precision model on 1,975 (98.8%), at the same accuracy: Measured through Ollama's llama.cpp engine; LM Studio runs the same engine and returned identical log-probabilities on the same file. **Q8_0 is the recommended file**; Q4_K_M is for machines with little memory.

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

**`ManniX-ITA/JackOD-9B-Coder` v3** quantized for **DFlash speculative decoding**: every quant tier of `JackOD-9B-Coder-MTP-GGUF` with the built-in MTP (NextN) layer removed, plus a separate **DFlash drafter** that does the drafting instead. Use **this** repo if your runtime drafts with DFlash. Use `JackOD-9B-Coder-MTP-GGUF` if it drafts with the model's own MTP head, or if you do not use speculative decoding at all. The two repos hold the same quantized weights; only the speculative-decoding path differs. JackOD-9B-Coder is a merge over `Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B` built for multi-turn agentic coding — DeltaCoder-9B 0.55 / Ornith-1.5-9B 0.30 / Coder-Flash 0.15, `omnimerge_v2`. The recipe, the evaluations and the full description are on the model card.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

GGUF quants of **`ManniX-ITA/JackOD-9B-Coder`**, a four-way `omnimerge_v2` merge over `Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B` built for **multi-turn agentic coding** — staying on a task across turns and tool calls until it is actually finished, and then stopping. > **v3 (2026-10-24).** v3 is the v2 recipe with the two smaller weights swapped: > **DeltaCoder 0.55 / Ornith-1.5-9B 0.30 / Coder-Flash 0.15** (v2: Coder-Flash 0.30 / Ornith 0.15). > `omnimerge_v2` density 0.53, darex-q 0.75, seed 42, the root `eos_token_id` 248046 / `pad_token_id` 248055 > fix and the Coder-Flash tokenizer and template are unchanged. v3 ships a **new serving sampler** and was > evaluated with it; the v2 and v1 results kept at the end of this card were measured **greedy**, so they are > a record, not a same-basis comparison. Every `_K` and `IQ` tier is **imatrix-calibrated**, including `Q6_K`. The calibration matrix used to build them is published in this repo as `imatrix.dat` (sha256 `feb286c4…`) so the quants can be audited and reproduced.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Self-contained single-file inference engine from the opencoti project — a Mozilla-Ocho llamafile base carrying the opencoti patch series: advanced KV residency/quantization (PolyKV, KVarN — see `docs/features/kvarn.md`), the KV rolling window (a KV cache larger than VRAM), elastic multi-session serving (elastic slots, an enforced KV admission gate with fast 429 + `Retry-After`, PolyKV shared-prefix pools with a REST control plane), DCA long-context extension, MTP speculative decode, sparse attention, RYS layer duplication, CUDA **and Vulkan** GPU backends, and a runtime introspection/control API. **Start with USAGE.md** — it explains exactly how this engine diverges from upstream llamafile, every added feature, its flags, defaults, limitations, and which features compose. This repo hosts the packaged release artifacts (they exceed GitHub's 2 GiB release-asset cap) plus the full patch series under `patches/` and the project documentation under `docs/`. Release notes and per-release `SHA256SUMS` live under `releases/` and are mirrored on the corresponding GitHub release at mann1x/opencoti.

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

GGUF quantizations of **`ManniX-ITA/Ornith-1.5-27B-A3B-Coder`** — the pure competence-map 184-expert cut of `Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B`. **→ Recipe, drop maps, the full 11-bench evaluation, the cross-family comparison and the length/deliberation analysis all live on the weights card.** This card covers the quantized files only. > Its sibling **CoderX** > uses the same map with a REAP stability floor and measures better on almost every code and > reasoning axis at the same expert budget and the same file size. Start there unless you > specifically want this arm.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗