humanizer
lackey43基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
_If this model is useful to you, support the work by following @nawariokra on X, or buy me a coffee on Ko-fi._ **`Qwen/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next` (125B MoE, 6B active) on one or two 24 GB GPUs plus CPU, with the full 262,144-token context.** Two GGUF shards: **47.5 GiB of weights** and a 48.3 GiB n-gram table (95.8 GiB in all). It runs on our own engine TRUSS. **Images:** `flashnext-mmproj-f16.gguf` is the Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vision encoder (Qwen3-VL style). With it the server takes `image_url` parts next to text: a 448x448 picture is 196 tokens, the long side is capped at 1,344 (1,764 tokens). Give the ViT its own card and start the server with `--mmproj`; see SERVING.md.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
_If this model is useful to you, support the work by following @nawariokra on X, or buy me a coffee on Ko-fi._ Run `Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B` with good quality on a single RTX 3090 (24 GB VRAM) at full 262,144-token context — 129 tok/s generation, up to 1268 tok/s prompt processing. This is an update to our earlier PAW-27B-X3 release, with lower quality loss at the same file sizes. Two example scenes, generated in one shot from a text prompt (three.js/WebGL code, output by this model, rendered in a browser):
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
The Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddings paper contains four unique BioclinicalBERT models: initialized with BERT-Base (biobert_v1.0_pubmed_pmc) or BioBERT (BioBERT-Base v1.0 + PubMed 200K + PMC 270K) & trained on either all MIMIC notes or only discharge summaries. This model card describes the Bio+Clinical BERT model, which was initialized from BioBERT & trained on all MIMIC notes and Padchest (translate to English by google translation). Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.