AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
85,001 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 85001

Discover models worth your attention

Krea Realtime 14B is distilled from the Wan 2.1 14B text-to-video model using Self-Forcing, a technique for converting regular video diffusion models into autoregressive models. It achieves a text-to-video inference speed of **11fps** using 4 inference steps on a single NVIDIA B200 GPU. For more details on our training methodology and sampling innovations, refer to our technical blog post. - Our model is over **10x larger than existing realtime video models** - We introduce **novel techniques for mitigating error accumulation,** including **KV Cache Recomputation** and **KV Cache Attention Bias** - We develop **memory optimizations specific to autoregressive video diffusion models** that facilitate training large autoregressive models - **Our model enables realtime interactive capabilities**: Users can modify prompts mid-generation, restyle videos on-the-fly, and see first frames within 1 second Krea realtime allows users to stream real videos, webcam inputs, or canvas primitives into the model, unlocking controllable video synthesis and editing

Input Text→ Output Video
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This is based on Oliver Guhr's work. The difference is that it is a finetuned xlm-roberta-base instead of an xlm-roberta-large and on twelve languages instead of four. The languages are: English, German, French, Spanish, Bulgarian, Italian, Polish, Dutch, Czech, Portugese, Slovak, Slovenian. 0 0.99 0.99 0.99 73317475 . 0.94 0.95 0.95 4484845 , 0.86 0.86 0.86 6100650 ? 0.88 0.85 0.86 136479 - 0.60 0.29 0.39 233630 : 0.71 0.49 0.58 152424 accuracy 0.98 84425503 macro avg 0.83 0.74 0.77 84425503 weighted avg 0.98 0.98 0.98 84425503

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

colibri container for **Qwen3.6-35B-A3B**, quantized to **group-scaled int4** (one f32 scale per 64 input elements per row, `expert_gs=64`, ~22 GB). This is the higher-accuracy sibling of the per-row container `Kreuzzelg/qwen36-35b-a3b-colibri-i4`: in a controlled A/B against an int8 anchor it cuts the first-token logit error by **~44 %** (mean cosine 0.98777 → 0.99313 over 4 prompts). Same self-contained layout (bundled `tokenizer.json`, flat `config.json`). **Which one should I use?** The per-row container is the current PR default and runs on the plain `qwen36-engine` branch. This gs64 container needs the group-scaled expert path (`matmul_q_gs`), which lives on the `gs64-ab` branch (pending upstream). If you're on that branch and want the best quality, use this one; the container size grows ~10 % (20 → 22 GB) and decode speed is unchanged. Behavior: greedy 512-token generation on 4 reasoning prompts showed **no degenerate loops** on either container — the group scaling is a quality improvement here, not a fix for a runaway-generation bug.

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

krinny-7b

krinny

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

dots.ocr-1.5

kristaller486

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

huginn-0125

KristianS7

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Ouro-2.6B

KristianS7

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

banano-kirtis-v2

kristijonas

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗