AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
85,001 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 85001

Discover models worth your attention

We present Kanana-2 SLM, **Kakao's second series of Small Language Models (SLMs)**, designed to deliver strong language capabilities while remaining compact and efficient for practical deployment. The series includes 3B, 1.3B, and 0.9B models. This release publicly includes the 3B model and the compressed 1.3B model, providing a balance between capability and efficiency for a wide range of applications. Kanana-2-3B was **pretrained from scratch on TPU clusters** and further improved through post-training with **supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning**, resulting in strong instruction-following and reasoning capabilities. Kanana-2-1.3B models are derived from Kanana-2-3B through a **cascade pruning and distillation pipeline**. To further improve deployment efficiency, they adopt **Sliding Window Attention (SWA)**, enabling memory-efficient long-context inference with support for context lengths of up to **32K tokens** while substantially reducing KV-cache memory requirements. General Tasks MMLU acc 5 62.77 56.49 62.32 MMLU-Pro acc 5 36.54 29.87 37.08 BBH acc 3 54.23 45.58 53.60 SimpleQA † acc 5 27.39 23.76 16.83 Mathematics Tasks MATH em 4 35.08 30.82 41.74 GSM8K em 8 61.03 51.93 75.74 Coding Tasks HumanEval pass@1 0 55.96 51.33 45.31 MBPP pass@1 3 50.95 44.86 53.85 Korean Tasks KMMLU acc 5 47.92 44.17 43.08 KoSimpleQA † acc 5 32.50 28.50 13.40 HAE-RAE Bench (v1.0) acc 5 80.66 75.34 55.54 MATH-Ko ‡ em 4 31.54 24.75 31.92 MBPP-Ko § pass@1 3 44.55 39.38 47.97 Long Context Tasks RULER-32K acc 0 67.50 55.72 69.01 Instruction-following, chat, tool-calling, code, math, and knowledge benchmarks for the Kanana-2 SLM series. Scores use greedy decoding (temperature 0.0, top-p 1.0, max 4096 tokens); the metric for each benchmark is listed in the Metric column.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This is an uncensored version of Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B created with abliteration (see remove-refusals-with-transformers to know more about it). This is a crude, proof-of-concept implementation to remove refusals from an LLM model without using TransformerLens. The newly added **Huihui-Qwen3.8-27B-abliterated-Underdog-Saluki** series come from ConwayResearch/Underdog-Saluki-27B-1.0 and ukisai/Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF. Only layers **22 to 52 (0-based indexing)** have been ablated, while the other layers remain unablated. It may come with a small disclaimer warning. Due to ConwayResearch/Underdog-Saluki-27B-1.0 not providing an imatrix file, we will attempt to perform ablation by mixing the GGUF weights of Swift-1.5 and ConwayResearch/Underdog-Saluki-27B-1.0.

Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

qwen3.8turbo

Kalaborative

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

kalia-v020

kalia-lm

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This repository contains more than 25 different types of embedding models, together with practical information about embeddings, document retrieval, chunking, context length, and local RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation). Some models might need a mmproj-file for image/video/audio - but i focus on txt here. * the quality and structure of your source documents * how the documents are converted to text * how the text is split into chunks * the embedding model * the vector database and retrieval settings * optional keyword or reranking steps * the context given to the main LLM * the main LLM itself * the system prompt Changing only the embedding model therefore does not automatically make a RAG system better.

Input Text→ Output Embedding
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗