基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Explore AI models 300
yolos-base-signature-detection
mdefrance基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
yolos-tiny-signature-detection
mdefranceYOLOS model finetuned to detect handwritten signatures in document images using [tech4humans/signature-detection](https://huggingface.co/datasets/tech4humans/signature-detection) dataset. Original YOLOS was introduced in the paper You Only Look at One Sequence: Rethinking Transformer in Vision through Object Detection by Fang et al. and first released in this repository. YOLOS is a Vision Transformer (ViT) trained using the DETR loss. Despite its simplicity, a base-sized YOLOS model is able to achieve 42 AP on COCO validation 2017 (similar to DETR and more complex frameworks such as Faster R-CNN).
UrbanOmniDetect
mehmetkeremturkcan基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
UrbanOmniDetect-2
mehmetkeremturkcan基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
human-fall-detection
melihuzunoglu基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
ppe-detection
melihuzunoglu基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
figpanel-yolov12
mermermer基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
fire-smoke-yolov8
mfranzon基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
conditional-detr-resnet-50
MicrosoftConditional DEtection TRansformer (DETR) model trained end-to-end on COCO 2017 object detection (118k annotated images). It was introduced in the paper Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergence by Meng et al. and first released in this repository. The recently-developed DETR approach applies the transformer encoder and decoder architecture to object detection and achieves promising performance. In this paper, we handle the critical issue, slow training convergence, and present a conditional cross-attention mechanism for fast DETR training. Our approach is motivated by that the cross-attention in DETR relies highly on the content embeddings for localizing the four extremities and predicting the box, which increases the need for high-quality content embeddings and thus the training difficulty. Our approach, named conditional DETR, learns a conditional spatial query from the decoder embedding for decoder multi-head cross-attention. The benefit is that through the conditional spatial query, each cross-attention head is able to attend to a band containing a distinct region, e.g., one object extremity or a region inside the object box. This narrows down the spatial range for localizing the distinct regions for object classification and box regression, thus relaxing the dependence on the content embeddings and easing the training. Empirical results show that conditional DETR converges 6.7× faster for the backbones R50 and R101 and 10× faster for stronger backbones DC5-R50 and DC5-R101. You can use the raw model for object detection. See the model hub to look for all available Conditional DETR models.
table-transformer-detection
MicrosoftTable Transformer (DETR) model trained on PubTables1M. It was introduced in the paper PubTables-1M: Towards Comprehensive Table Extraction From Unstructured Documents by Smock et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Table Transformer did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Table Transformer is equivalent to DETR, a Transformer-based object detection model. Note that the authors decided to use the "normalize before" setting of DETR, which means that layernorm is applied before self- and cross-attention.
Table Transformer (DETR) model trained on PubTables1M. It was introduced in the paper PubTables-1M: Towards Comprehensive Table Extraction From Unstructured Documents by Smock et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Table Transformer did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Table Transformer is equivalent to DETR, a Transformer-based object detection model. Note that the authors decided to use the "normalize before" setting of DETR, which means that layernorm is applied before self- and cross-attention.
Table Transformer (TATR) model trained on PubTables1M and FinTabNet.c. It was introduced in the paper Aligning benchmark datasets for table structure recognition by Smock et al. and first released in this repository. Disclaimer: The team releasing Table Transformer did not write a model card for this model so this model card has been written by the Hugging Face team. The Table Transformer is equivalent to DETR, a Transformer-based object detection model. Note that the authors decided to use the "normalize before" setting of DETR, which means that layernorm is applied before self- and cross-attention.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Ultralytics
MidnightRunner3. Place your .pt files: • Segmentation → models/ultralytics/segm/ • Detection (bbox) → models/ultralytics/bbox/ 4. Restart ComfyUI 5. In the UI: Add Node → Model → Ultralytics → choose segm/… or bbox/…. Connect an Image Loader → Ultralytics node → Previewer Since getattr is classified as a dangerous pickle function, any segmentation model that uses it is classified as unsafe.
yolov11-license-plate-detection
morsetechlabThis is a fine-tuned version of YOLOv11 (n, s, m, l, x) specialized for **License Plate Detection**, using a public dataset from Roboflow Universe: License Plate Recognition Dataset (10,125 images) The upstream Roboflow dataset (`license-plate-recognition-rxg4e`) contains **train/test contamination** — the same source images appear in both the training and test splits with only minor manual augmentation applied (see Discussion #2 for concrete examples). As a result: - **The reported metrics below are likely overestimated**, because the test set is not a true held-out evaluation. - Real-world generalization performance is expected to be lower than the numbers in the table. - Treat all evaluation figures with caution and validate the model on your own held-out data before production use.
This repository contains a **YOLOv12x** object detection model fine-tuned to detect individual panels in comic book pages. The model identifies the bounding boxes for each panel, making it a valuable tool for digitizing comics, extracting content, or building datasets for downstream analysis. This model was trained in PyTorch using the powerful `ultralytics` library and demonstrates high performance on a custom-annotated dataset of comic pages. *Visit this space to try out the model right now: `The_Best_Comic_Panel_Detection`.*
pcb-aoi-yolo-rmutt
Moszer777基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
LibreGemma4e4b-i1-GGUF
mradermacher基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Polaris-VGA-0.8B-Post1.0-GGUF
mradermacher基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Polaris-VGA-27B-Post1.0e-GGUF
mradermacher基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Polaris-VGA-27B-Post1.0e-i1-GGUF
mradermacher基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Polaris-VGA-2B-Post1.0-GGUF
mradermacher基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
No matching models
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
Great models. Clear costs.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
Understand before you choose
How should API prices be compared?+
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Do open weights mean free commercial use?+
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.