AI NEWS · 模型情报站发现能力边界,让每一次选择更有依据 ↗基础档案先收录 · 缺失资料持续补齐
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 模型探索,从这里开始

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。

热门探索
41,867 款模型档案6820 家厂商 / 发布者45 个能力分类464 款有可比报价 · 30 款有公开评测
T文本生成▧图像生成▷视频生成⌘代码生成◖语音合成♫音乐生成⬡3D 建模▤文档分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

探索 AI 模型 18

为你发现值得关注的模型

PII-Tracer-GGUF

perplexity-ai

GGUF packaging of `perplexity-ai/PII-Tracer`, a PII masking model for conversational data. The model uses a ~600M-parameter bidirectional Qwen3 encoder with a `perplexity-ai/pplx-embed-v1-0.6b` backbone and two heads: The backbone is provided as an f16 GGUF for llama.cpp. Both heads remain in fp32 in `heads.safetensors`. The included Python client applies the heads to per-token hidden states from `llama-server`, decodes PII spans, and masks text. Install a compatible `llama-server` build and the Python client dependencies, then download the repository:

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

PII-Tracer-MLX

perplexity-ai

MLX weights for PII-Tracer, a PII masking model for conversational data. The model uses a ~600M-parameter bidirectional Qwen3 encoder with a `perplexity-ai/pplx-embed-v1-0.6b` backbone and two heads: The backbone's linear projections use **8-bit affine quantization with group size 64**. Embeddings and normalization weights remain bf16; both heads remain fp32. The weights file is approximately 779 MB. Quantized projections retain the `backbone.*` key names and store packed `uint32` `weight` tensors with bf16 `scales` and `biases`. The unquantized heads use `token_cls_head.*` and `sensitivity_head.*`.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

llama.cpp GGUF build of the pplx-computer qwen3.8 27B checkpoint (`Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration`, dense hybrid GDN linear-attention + full attention every 4th of 64 layers), converted 2026-08-26 from the raw bf16 checkpoint. Ships **two speculative-decoding drafts — pick one**: the checkpoint's native MTP head, or the DFlash2 block-diffusion drafter. DFlash2 is **not** in llama.cpp master: build PR #27342 (`z-lab:dflash2`, verified at `f7aadef`). On master the draft fails with `done_getting_tensors: wrong number of tensors; expected 81, got 58`. DFlash2 drafts longer blocks per verification step (higher throughput ceiling); native MTP has a higher acceptance rate and runs on unpatched llama.cpp. Default to MTP unless you already run the PR build.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

分类待补充
输入 待核验→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

pplx-embed-v1-0.6b

perplexity-ai

`pplx-embed-v1` and `pplx-embed-context-v1` are state-of-the-art text embedding models optimized for real-world, web-scale retrieval tasks. - Use **`pplx-embed-v1`** for independent text embedding (queries, documents, semantic search) - Use **`pplx-embed-context-v1`** for document chunks in RAG systems where surrounding context matters > [!IMPORTANT] > `pplx-embed-v1` and `pplx-embed-context-v1` natively produce *unnormalized* int8-quantized embeddings. Ensure that you compare them via *cosine similarity*.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 向量
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

pplx-embed-v1-4b

perplexity-ai

`pplx-embed-v1` and `pplx-embed-context-v1` are state-of-the-art text embedding models optimized for real-world, web-scale retrieval tasks. > [!IMPORTANT] > `pplx-embed-v1` and `pplx-embed-context-v1` natively produce *unnormalized* int8-quantized embeddings. Ensure that you compare them via *cosine similarity*. Many modern embedding models rely on instruction tuning, where users prepend an instruction string to the text being embedded. This can yield a 2%-3% lift on benchmarks, but it also introduces prompt-selection overhead and can make indexing pipelines brittle (small instruction changes can shift embedding space). We deliberately **avoid** this requirement: you can embed the text you want to index directly, without having to choose or maintain an instruction prefix.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 向量
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗
COST EXPLORER

好模型,也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型,再做选择

选型与常见问题
API 价格应该怎么比较?+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重,就代表可以免费商用吗?+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一,就是最适合我的模型吗?+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。

AI NEWS · 从信息到选择

资讯看趋势,工具提效率,模型筑可能。

探索 AI 资讯 ↗发现 AI 工具 ↗