THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 模型探索，从这里开始

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

从语言到影像，从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本，
为你的下一个想法，找到合适的智能引擎。

热门探索

84,991 款模型档案13202 家厂商 / 发布者45 个能力分类465 款有可比报价 · 30 款有公开评测

T文本生成 ▧图像生成 ▷视频生成 ⌘代码生成 ◖语音合成 ♫音乐生成 ⬡3D 建模 ▤文档分析

DISCOVER & COMPARE

探索 AI 模型 3

厂商输入输出许可

为你发现值得关注的模型

MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large

lytang

The model is based on DeBERTa-v3-Large that predicts a binary label - 1 for supported and 0 for unsupported. The model is doing predictions on the *sentence-level*. It takes as input a document and a sentence and determine whether the sentence is supported by the document: **MiniCheck-Model(document, claim) -> {0, 1}** MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large is fine tuned from `microsoft/deberta-v3-large` (He et al., 2023) on the combination of 35K data: - 21K ANLI data (Nie et al., 2020) - 14K synthetic data generated from scratch in a structed way (more details in the paper). The performance of these models is evaluated on our new collected benchmark (unseen by our models during training), LLM-AggreFact, from 11 recent human annotated datasets on fact-checking and grounding LLM generations. MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large outperform all exisiting specialized fact-checkers with a similar scale. See full results in our work.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析

输入文本→ 输出文本

价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对

查看详情 ↗

加入对比来源 / 文档 ↗

MiniCheck-Flan-T5-Large

lytang

📃 **MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents**,(EMNLP 2024, GitHub Repo) The model is based on Flan-T5-Large that predicts a binary label - 1 for supported and 0 for unsupported. The model is doing predictions on the *sentence-level*. It takes as input a document and a sentence and determine whether the sentence is supported by the document: **MiniCheck-Model(document, claim) -> {0, 1}** The performance of these models is evaluated on our new collected benchmark (unseen by our models during training), LLM-AggreFact, from 11 recent human annotated datasets on fact-checking and grounding LLM generations. MiniCheck-Flan-T5-Large outperform all exisiting specialized fact-checkers with a similar scale by a large margin (4-10% absolute increase) and is on par with GPT-4, but 400x cheaper. See full results in our work.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析

输入文本→ 输出文本

价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对

查看详情 ↗

加入对比来源 / 文档 ↗

MiniCheck-RoBERTa-Large

lytang

The model is based on RoBERTA-Large that predicts a binary label - 1 for supported and 0 for unsupported. The model is doing predictions on the *sentence-level*. It takes as input a document and a sentence and determine whether the sentence is supported by the document: **MiniCheck-Model(document, claim) -> {0, 1}** MiniCheck-RoBERTa-Large is fine tuned from the trained RoBERTA-Large model from AlignScore (Zha et al., 2023) on 14K synthetic data generated from scratch in a structed way (more details in the paper). We also have other three MiniCheck model variants: - bespokelabs/Bespoke-Minicheck-7B (Model Size: 7B) - lytang/MiniCheck-Flan-T5-Large (Model Size: 0.8B) - lytang/MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large (Model Size: 0.4B)

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析

输入文本→ 输出文本

价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对

查看详情 ↗

加入对比来源 / 文档 ↗

COST EXPLORER

好模型，也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量，直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

每月输入 Token 10 M每月输出 Token 2 M1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照；不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费，请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型，再做选择

选型与常见问题

API 价格应该怎么比较？+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格，再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费，不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重，就代表可以免费商用吗？+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一，就是最适合我的模型吗？+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本，再选择模型。

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

探索 AI 模型 3

MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large

MiniCheck-Flan-T5-Large

MiniCheck-RoBERTa-Large

暂未找到匹配模型

好模型，也要算好成本。

读懂模型，再做选择

资讯看趋势，工具提效率，模型筑可能。