**Multilingual, non-autoregressive System 1 decision model.** Give it a **state** (text, email, ticket, or JSON) and **typed questions**; it returns typed answers with mathematically calibrated probabilities in a single forward pass (~33 ms) across 100+ languages. Trained with reinforcement learning against strictly proper scoring rules (**RLCD**), so reporting honest probabilities is the only way to maximise reward. It never generates text, so there is nothing to parse and nothing to hallucinate. Python 3.10 or newer. Optional extras: `laya[serve]` (HTTP server), `laya[mcp]` (MCP server), `laya[langchain]` (LangChain and LangGraph), `laya[onnx]` (ONNX Runtime), `laya[fast]` (TileLang GPU fast path). Platform-by-platform setup is in the GitHub README. **Long documents.** `laya-multilingual` reads up to 8,192 tokens with `max_len=8192`. Measured accuracy and time by document length (benchmark script):

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析

输入文本→ 输出文本

价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对

查看详情 ↗

加入对比来源 / 文档 ↗

laya-multilingual

convaiinnovations

Non-autoregressive **System 1 decision model** covering 100+ languages. Give it a **state** (text, email, ticket, or JSON) and **typed questions**; it returns typed answers with probabilities in a single forward pass. No text generation, so nothing to parse and nothing to hallucinate. Part of the Laya family — **use this checkpoint for anything that is not English.** > **Long documents: `laya-multilingual` reads up to 8,192 tokens.** It ships with a 1,024-token limit that cuts long documents off, so pass `max_len=8192` for them: > > > > In the table below, 16 to 18 of 20 requests were answered correctly with up to about 4,000 tokens of text before them; beyond that results vary (8 to 17 of 20), so check long-document accuracy on your own data. Short inputs give identical answers with `max_len=8192`, and speed follows the input's real length, not the limit: short inputs are unchanged, and a 4,000-token input takes about 1.7 s on an Apple GPU.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析

输入文本→ 输出文本

价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对

查看详情 ↗

加入对比来源 / 文档 ↗

laya-typed-decisions

convaiinnovations

Non-autoregressive **System 1 decision model**, fine-tuned on the typed-decisions workflows: agent-trace observability, customer service, invoice processing and security incidents. **+3.9 points over Jev's published 0.727, above the 0.735 teacher ceiling**, with 2.4x better Brier and 1.6x better score MAE. Jev figures are third-party published, not measured here — there is no TypeSafe API access in this project, and sample sizes and prompts differ. Treat the comparison as indicative.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析

输入文本→ 输出文本

价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对

查看详情 ↗

加入对比来源 / 文档 ↗

COST EXPLORER

好模型，也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量，直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

每月输入 Token 10 M每月输出 Token 2 M1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照；不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费，请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型，再做选择

选型与常见问题

API 价格应该怎么比较？+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格，再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费，不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重，就代表可以免费商用吗？+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一，就是最适合我的模型吗？+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本，再选择模型。

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

探索 AI 模型 4

ECG-Instruct-Llama-3.2-11B-Vision

laya

laya-multilingual

laya-typed-decisions

暂未找到匹配模型

好模型，也要算好成本。

读懂模型，再做选择

资讯看趋势，工具提效率，模型筑可能。