AI NEWS · 模型情报站发现能力边界,让每一次选择更有依据 ↗基础档案先收录 · 缺失资料持续补齐
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 模型探索,从这里开始

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。

热门探索
84,939 款模型档案13162 家厂商 / 发布者45 个能力分类465 款有可比报价 · 30 款有公开评测
T文本生成▧图像生成▷视频生成⌘代码生成◖语音合成♫音乐生成⬡3D 建模▤文档分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

探索 AI 模型 3

为你发现值得关注的模型

HeBERT is a Hebrew pretrained language model. It is based on Google's BERT architecture and it is BERT-Base config. HeBert was trained on three dataset: 1. A Hebrew version of OSCAR: ~9.8 GB of data, including 1 billion words and over 20.8 millions sentences. 2. A Hebrew dump of Wikipedia: ~650 MB of data, including over 63 millions words and 3.8 millions sentences 3. Emotion User Generated Content (UGC) data that was collected for the purpose of this study (described below). The ability of the model to classify named entities in text, such as persons' names, organizations, and locations; tested on a labeled dataset from Ben Mordecai and M Elhadad (2005), and evaluated with F1-score.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

HeBERT is a Hebrew pre-trained language model. It is based on Google's BERT architecture and it is BERT-Base config (Devlin et al. 2018). HeBert was trained on three datasets: 1. A Hebrew version of OSCAR (Ortiz, 2019): ~9.8 GB of data, including 1 billion words and over 20.8 million sentences. 2. A Hebrew dump of Wikipedia: ~650 MB of data, including over 63 million words and 3.8 million sentences 3. Emotion UGC data was collected for the purpose of this study. (described below) We evaluated the model on emotion recognition and sentiment analysis, for downstream tasks. Our User-Generated Content (UGC) is comments written on articles collected from 3 major news sites, between January 2020 to August 2020, Total data size of ~150 MB of data, including over 7 million words and 350K sentences. 4000 sentences annotated by crowd members (3-10 annotators per sentence) for 8 emotions (anger, disgust, expectation, fear, happy, sadness, surprise, and trust) and overall sentiment/polarity In order to validate the annotation, we search for an agreement between raters to emotion in each sentence using Krippendorff's alpha (krippendorff, 1970). We left sentences that got alpha > 0.7. Note that while we found a general agreement between raters about emotions like happiness, trust, and disgust, there are few emotions with general disagreement about them, apparently given the complexity of finding them in the text (e.g. expectation and surprise).

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗
COST EXPLORER

好模型,也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型,再做选择

选型与常见问题
API 价格应该怎么比较?+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重,就代表可以免费商用吗?+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一,就是最适合我的模型吗?+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。

AI NEWS · 从信息到选择

资讯看趋势,工具提效率,模型筑可能。

探索 AI 资讯 ↗发现 AI 工具 ↗