Llama Guard 3-1B is a fine-tuned Llama-3.2-1B pretrained model for content safety classification. Similar to previous versions, it can be used to classify content in both LLM inputs (prompt classification) and in LLM responses (response classification). It acts as an LLM – it generates text in its output that indicates whether a given prompt or response is safe or unsafe, and if unsafe, it also lists the content categories violated. Llama Guard 3-1B was aligned to safeguard against the MLCommons standardized hazards taxonomy and designed to lower the deployment cost of moderation system safeguard compared to its predecessors. It comes in two versions : 1B and 1B pruned and quantized, optimized for deployment on mobile devices. This repository contains two versions of Llama-Guard-3-1B, for use with transformers and with the original `llama` codebase. Once you have access to the model weights, follow the appropriate section.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本生成

输入文本→ 输出文本

价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对

查看详情 ↗

加入对比来源 / 文档 ↗

WizardLM-2-8x22B

alpindale

We introduce and opensource WizardLM-2, our next generation state-of-the-art large language models, which have improved performance on complex chat, multilingual, reasoning and agent. New family includes three cutting-edge models: WizardLM-2 8x22B, WizardLM-2 70B, and WizardLM-2 7B. We also adopt the automatic MT-Bench evaluation framework based on GPT-4 proposed by lmsys to assess the performance of models. The WizardLM-2 8x22B even demonstrates highly competitive performance compared to the most advanced proprietary models. Meanwhile, WizardLM-2 7B and WizardLM-2 70B are all the top-performing models among the other leading baselines at 7B to 70B model scales. We carefully collected a complex and challenging set consisting of real-world instructions, which includes main requirements of humanity, such as writing, coding, math, reasoning, agent, and multilingual. We report the win:loss rate without tie:

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本生成

输入文本→ 输出文本

价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对

查看详情 ↗

加入对比来源 / 文档 ↗

COST EXPLORER

好模型，也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量，直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

每月输入 Token 10 M每月输出 Token 2 M1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照；不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费，请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型，再做选择

选型与常见问题

API 价格应该怎么比较？+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格，再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费，不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重，就代表可以免费商用吗？+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一，就是最适合我的模型吗？+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本，再选择模型。

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

探索 AI 模型 8

c4ai-command-r-plus-GPTQ

dbrx-instruct

Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct

Llama-3.2-1B

Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct

Llama-3.2-90B-Vision

Llama-Guard-3-1B

WizardLM-2-8x22B

暂未找到匹配模型

好模型，也要算好成本。

读懂模型，再做选择

资讯看趋势，工具提效率，模型筑可能。