AI NEWS · 模型情报站发现能力边界,让每一次选择更有依据 ↗基础档案先收录 · 缺失资料持续补齐
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 模型探索,从这里开始

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。

热门探索
84,938 款模型档案13161 家厂商 / 发布者45 个能力分类465 款有可比报价 · 30 款有公开评测
T文本生成▧图像生成▷视频生成⌘代码生成◖语音合成♫音乐生成⬡3D 建模▤文档分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

探索 AI 模型 8

为你发现值得关注的模型

granite-4.2-8B

webAI-Official

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

TwIL-LM

webAI-Official

A 1.7B reasoning model for **formal logic** tasks, built from `HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-1.7B-Instruct` through LoRA supervised fine-tuning, checkpoint fusion, WiSE-FT weight interpolation, and entropy-weighted GRPO reinforcement learning. It raises in-domain formal-logic performance by **+49% relative** over its base model (macro gate 0.263 → 0.393), and on the strict, no-partial-credit reading of Track A it is the strongest model we have measured at any size — ahead of Qwen3-8B and of a 26B Gemma-4 MoE. Its larger sibling, **TwIL-LM3** (3B, from SmolLM3), trades a smaller in-domain gain for strictly better held-out retention. If you care about not regressing on general benchmarks, prefer that one.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

TwIL-LM2

webAI-Official

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

TwIL-LM3

webAI-Official

A 3B reasoning model for **formal logic** tasks, built from `HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM3-3B` through LoRA supervised fine-tuning, checkpoint fusion, WiSE-FT weight interpolation, and entropy-weighted GRPO reinforcement learning. It improves in-domain formal-logic performance by **+26% relative** over its base model (macro gate 0.336 → 0.422) **and improves held-out benchmark performance at the same time** (+0.022 core average). It is the only arm in this project that gains on both tracks, which is why it is the recommended release of the pair. * **Gains on both tracks at once** — the only arm in this project that does. In-domain macro gate 0.336 → 0.422, and the held-out 10-dataset macro 0.7193 → 0.7339 rather than the usual collapse that follows task-specific fine-tuning. * **Beats every arm up to and including LFM2.5-8B-A1B** — roughly three times its parameter count — on all six Track A objective lanes and all four summary rows, not on average alone. * **Competitive with 8B on strict scoring.** On strict-7, which gives no loose-match credit anywhere, it sits 0.012 behind Qwen3-8B (0.1971 against 0.2093) at 2.6x fewer parameters, and ahead of it on Lean formalisation (token-F1 0.5869 against 0.4022) and semantic parsing (0.4416 against 0.4257). * **Structured formal output.** Tuned for the objects rather than the prose: FOL translation, entailment labels, semantic parses, Lean statements and Lean proof critique. * **The most efficient arm measured, at any scale.** 482-token Track B generations and 32.9 completed answers per second — about eight times gpt-oss-120b's rate — because it answers short rather than because it decodes unusually fast. * **Lowest maths-corpus perplexity of any released arm in the table** (3.8229), including Qwen3-8B at 4.0083. * **Runs anywhere.** 3.08B parameters in bf16, with Q4\_K\_M GGUF at 1.78 GiB for CPU or 4 GB of VRAM.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

TwIL-LM3-Pro

webAI-Official

A 3.66B reasoning model for **formal logic** tasks, built from `ibm-granite/granite-4.2-3b` through LoRA supervised fine-tuning, checkpoint fusion, WiSE-FT weight interpolation, and entropy-weighted GRPO reinforcement learning. It improves in-domain formal-logic performance by **+28% relative** over its base model (macro gate 0.431 → 0.554) **while holding held-out benchmark performance** — the 10-dataset macro is level with the base (0.7942 → 0.7901) and the 14-dataset macro improves slightly (0.7332 → 0.7425). On the same harness and sampled rows it reaches the highest Track A macro gate, strict-7 and six-lane average of any arm in the tables below for which each can be computed, including Qwen3-8B, Qwen3.5-4B, VibeThinker-3B and gpt-oss-120b (the 120B has no gate or strict-7 value). *VibeThinker-webAI-trained is the public VibeThinker-3B after the same post-training pipeline (SLERP, d = 0.5, t = 0.5); see Against the tuned VibeThinker-3B. It has no strict-7 or six-lane-average value, so those bars show n/a.*

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

webAI-ColVec1-4b

webAI-Official

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

分类待补充
输入 待核验→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

webAI-ColVec1-9b

webAI-Official

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

分类待补充
输入 待核验→ 输出 待核验
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗
COST EXPLORER

好模型,也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型,再做选择

选型与常见问题
API 价格应该怎么比较?+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重,就代表可以免费商用吗?+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一,就是最适合我的模型吗?+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。

AI NEWS · 从信息到选择

资讯看趋势,工具提效率,模型筑可能。

探索 AI 资讯 ↗发现 AI 工具 ↗