AI NEWS.ccAI正在发生 未来正在更新
♡ 我的收藏 0
AI NEWS · 模型情报站发现能力边界，让每一次选择更有依据 ↗基础档案先收录 · 缺失资料持续补齐
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 模型探索，从这里开始

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

从语言到影像，从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本，
为你的下一个想法，找到合适的智能引擎。

热门探索
84,999 款模型档案13202 家厂商 / 发布者45 个能力分类465 款有可比报价 · 30 款有公开评测
T文本生成▧图像生成▷视频生成⌘代码生成◖语音合成♫音乐生成⬡3D 建模▤文档分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

探索 AI 模型 2428

为你发现值得关注的模型

Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a document. Thanks to these keyphrases humans can understand the content of a text very quickly and easily without reading it completely. Keyphrase extraction was first done primarily by human annotators, who read the text in detail and then wrote down the most important keyphrases. The disadvantage is that if you work with a lot of documents, this process can take a lot of time ⏳. Here is where Artificial Intelligence 🤖 comes in. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistical and linguistic features, are widely used for the extraction process. Now with deep learning, it is possible to capture the semantic meaning of a text even better than these classical methods. Classical methods look at the frequency, occurrence and order of words in the text, whereas these neural approaches can capture long-term semantic dependencies and context of words in a text. This model uses distilbert as its base model and fine-tunes it on the Inspec dataset.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

Keyphrase extraction is a technique in text analysis where you extract the important keyphrases from a document. Thanks to these keyphrases humans can understand the content of a text very quickly and easily without reading it completely. Keyphrase extraction was first done primarily by human annotators, who read the text in detail and then wrote down the most important keyphrases. The disadvantage is that if you work with a lot of documents, this process can take a lot of time ⏳. Here is where Artificial Intelligence 🤖 comes in. Currently, classical machine learning methods, that use statistical and linguistic features, are widely used for the extraction process. Now with deep learning, it is possible to capture the semantic meaning of a text even better than these classical methods. Classical methods look at the frequency, occurrence and order of words in the text, whereas these neural approaches can capture long-term semantic dependencies and context of words in a text. This model uses KBIR as its base model and fine-tunes it on the Inspec dataset. KBIR or Keyphrase Boundary Infilling with Replacement is a pre-trained model which utilizes a multi-task learning setup for optimizing a combined loss of Masked Language Modeling (MLM), Keyphrase Boundary Infilling (KBI) and Keyphrase Replacement Classification (KRC). You can find more information about the architecture in this paper.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model is a XLM-Roberta-large model fine-tuned for Named Entity Recognition (NER) over the Spanish portion of the CoNLL-2002 dataset. Evaluating it over the test subset of this dataset, we get a F1-score of 89.17, being one of the best NER for Spanish available at the moment.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model was trained on 1.279.665 hypothesis-premise pairs from 8 NLI datasets: MultiNLI, Fever-NLI, LingNLI and DocNLI (which includes ANLI, QNLI, DUC, CNN/DailyMail, Curation). It is the only model in the model hub trained on 8 NLI datasets, including DocNLI with very long texts to learn long range reasoning. Note that the model was trained on binary NLI to predict either "entailment" or "not-entailment". The DocNLI merges the classes "neural" and "contradiction" into "not-entailment" to enable the inclusion of the DocNLI dataset. The base model is DeBERTa-v3-base from Microsoft. The v3 variant of DeBERTa substantially outperforms previous versions of the model by including a different pre-training objective, see annex 11 of the original DeBERTa paper as well as the DeBERTa-V3 paper.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model is answerdotai/ModernBERT-base fine-tuned on the same dataset mix as the `zeroshot-v2.0` models in the Zeroshot Classifiers Collection. The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 5e-05 - train_batch_size: 32 - eval_batch_size: 128 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Use adamw_torch with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments - lr_scheduler_type: linear - lr_scheduler_warmup_ratio: 0.06 - num_epochs: 2

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model is answerdotai/ModernBERT-large fine-tuned on the same dataset mix as the `zeroshot-v2.0` models in the Zeroshot Classifiers Collection. The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 9e-06 - train_batch_size: 16 - eval_batch_size: 32 - seed: 42 - gradient_accumulation_steps: 2 - total_train_batch_size: 32 - optimizer: Use adamw_torch with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 and optimizer_args=No additional optimizer arguments - lr_scheduler_type: linear - lr_scheduler_warmup_ratio: 0.06 - num_epochs: 2

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

文本分析
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗
COST EXPLORER

好模型，也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量，直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照；不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费，请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型，再做选择

选型与常见问题
API 价格应该怎么比较？+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格，再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费，不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重，就代表可以免费商用吗？+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一，就是最适合我的模型吗？+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本，再选择模型。

AI NEWS · 从信息到选择

资讯看趋势，工具提效率，模型筑可能。

探索 AI 资讯 ↗发现 AI 工具 ↗