AI NEWS · 模型情报站发现能力边界,让每一次选择更有依据 ↗基础档案先收录 · 缺失资料持续补齐
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 模型探索,从这里开始

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。

热门探索
84,999 款模型档案13202 家厂商 / 发布者45 个能力分类465 款有可比报价 · 30 款有公开评测
T文本生成▧图像生成▷视频生成⌘代码生成◖语音合成♫音乐生成⬡3D 建模▤文档分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

探索 AI 模型 2428

为你发现值得关注的模型

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

BLEURT-20

lucadiliello

Take a look at this repository for the definition of `BleurtConfig`, `BleurtForSequenceClassification` and `BleurtTokenizer` in PyTorch.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

BLEURT-20-D12

lucadiliello

Take a look at this repository for the definition of `BleurtConfig`, `BleurtForSequenceClassification` and `BleurtTokenizer` in PyTorch.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

FinBERT-PT-BR

lucas-leme

FinBERT-PT-BR is a pre-trained NLP model to analyze sentiment of Brazilian Portuguese financial texts. The model was trained in two main stages: language modeling and sentiment modeling. In the first stage, a language model was trained with more than 1.4 million texts of financial news in Portuguese. From this first training, it was possible to build a sentiment classifier with few labeled texts (500) that presented a satisfactory convergence. At the end of the work, a comparative analysis with other models and the possible applications of the developed model are presented. In the comparative analysis, it was possible to observe that the developed model presented better results than the current models in the state of the art. Among the applications, it was demonstrated that the model can be used to build sentiment indices, investment strategies and macroeconomic data analysis, such as inflation.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

pos_thai

lunarlist

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model is a fine-tuned version of distilbert-base-uncased on the imdb dataset (training notebook is here). It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.1903 - Accuracy: 0.928 The following hyperparameters were used during training: - learning_rate: 5e-05 - train_batch_size: 16 - eval_batch_size: 16 - seed: 42 - optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08 - lr_scheduler_type: linear - num_epochs: 1 - Transformers 4.15.0 - Pytorch 1.10.0+cu111 - Datasets 1.17.0 - Tokenizers 0.10.3

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model is distilled from the zero-shot classification pipeline on the Multilingual Sentiment dataset using this script. In reality the multilingual-sentiment dataset is annotated of course, but we'll pretend and ignore the annotations for the sake of example. Teacher model: MoritzLaurer/mDeBERTa-v3-base-mnli-xnli Teacher hypothesis template: "The sentiment of this text is {}." Student model: distilbert-base-multilingual-cased

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

- **Paper:** https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.00847 - **Model:** URM-LLaMa-3.1-8B - Fine-tuned from Skywork-Reward-Llama-3.1-8B

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

The model is based on DeBERTa-v3-Large that predicts a binary label - 1 for supported and 0 for unsupported. The model is doing predictions on the *sentence-level*. It takes as input a document and a sentence and determine whether the sentence is supported by the document: **MiniCheck-Model(document, claim) -> {0, 1}** MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large is fine tuned from `microsoft/deberta-v3-large` (He et al., 2023) on the combination of 35K data: - 21K ANLI data (Nie et al., 2020) - 14K synthetic data generated from scratch in a structed way (more details in the paper). The performance of these models is evaluated on our new collected benchmark (unseen by our models during training), LLM-AggreFact, from 11 recent human annotated datasets on fact-checking and grounding LLM generations. MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large outperform all exisiting specialized fact-checkers with a similar scale. See full results in our work.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

📃 **MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documents**,(EMNLP 2024, GitHub Repo) The model is based on Flan-T5-Large that predicts a binary label - 1 for supported and 0 for unsupported. The model is doing predictions on the *sentence-level*. It takes as input a document and a sentence and determine whether the sentence is supported by the document: **MiniCheck-Model(document, claim) -> {0, 1}** The performance of these models is evaluated on our new collected benchmark (unseen by our models during training), LLM-AggreFact, from 11 recent human annotated datasets on fact-checking and grounding LLM generations. MiniCheck-Flan-T5-Large outperform all exisiting specialized fact-checkers with a similar scale by a large margin (4-10% absolute increase) and is on par with GPT-4, but 400x cheaper. See full results in our work.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

The model is based on RoBERTA-Large that predicts a binary label - 1 for supported and 0 for unsupported. The model is doing predictions on the *sentence-level*. It takes as input a document and a sentence and determine whether the sentence is supported by the document: **MiniCheck-Model(document, claim) -> {0, 1}** MiniCheck-RoBERTa-Large is fine tuned from the trained RoBERTA-Large model from AlignScore (Zha et al., 2023) on 14K synthetic data generated from scratch in a structed way (more details in the paper). We also have other three MiniCheck model variants: - bespokelabs/Bespoke-Minicheck-7B (Model Size: 7B) - lytang/MiniCheck-Flan-T5-Large (Model Size: 0.8B) - lytang/MiniCheck-DeBERTa-v3-Large (Model Size: 0.4B)

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "SoftwareApplication", "name": "Gibberish Detector - High-Accuracy Text Classification Model", "url": "https://huggingface.co/madhurjindal/autonlp-Gibberish-Detector-492513457", "applicationCategory": "NaturalLanguageProcessing", "description": "State-of-the-art gibberish detection model using DistilBERT. Detect nonsensical text, spam, and incoherent input with 97.36% accuracy. Perfect for chatbots, content moderation, and text validation.", "keywords": "gibberish detector, gibberish detection, text classification, spam filter, content moderation, text validation, NLP model, DistilBERT, AutoNLP, text quality, input validation, chatbot filter", "creator": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Madhur Jindal" }, "datePublished": "2021-05-01", "softwareVersion": "1.0", "operatingSystem": "Cross-platform", "offers": { "@type": "Offer", "price": "0", "priceCurrency": "USD" } } **State-of-the-art gibberish detection model** that accurately identifies nonsensical text, spam, and incoherent input in English. Built with DistilBERT and AutoNLP, this model achieves **97.36% accuracy** in multi-class text classification, making it the ideal solution for content moderation, chatbot input validation, and text quality assurance. - **🎯 97.36% Accuracy**: Industry-leading performance in gibberish detection - **⚡ Fast Inference**: Optimized DistilBERT architecture for real-time applications - **🏷️ Multi-Class Detection**: Distinguishes between Noise, Word Salad, Mild Gibberish, and Clean text - **🔧 Easy Integration**: Simple API with transformers pipeline - **🌐 Production Ready**: Tested on diverse real-world datasets - **💚 Eco-Friendly**: Low carbon footprint (5.53g CO2 emissions)

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

Jailbreak-Detector

madhurjindal

Welcome to the **Jailbreak-Detector** model, an advanced AI solution engineered for detecting jailbreak attempts in user interactions. This state-of-the-art model is pivotal for maintaining the security, integrity, and reliability of AI systems across various applications, including automated customer service, content moderation, and other interactive AI platforms. By leveraging this model, organizations can enhance their AI system's defenses against malicious activities, ensuring safe and secure user interactions. In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI), ensuring the security and integrity of deployed models is of paramount importance. One critical challenge is the potential for "jailbreaking"—a process where users exploit vulnerabilities to manipulate AI systems into performing unintended or harmful actions. To mitigate this risk, we present the **Jailbreak-Detector** model, meticulously trained to identify and classify jailbreak attempts.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗
COST EXPLORER

好模型,也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型,再做选择

选型与常见问题
API 价格应该怎么比较?+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重,就代表可以免费商用吗?+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一,就是最适合我的模型吗?+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。

AI NEWS · 从信息到选择

资讯看趋势,工具提效率,模型筑可能。

探索 AI 资讯 ↗发现 AI 工具 ↗