AI NEWS · 模型情报站发现能力边界,让每一次选择更有依据 ↗基础档案先收录 · 缺失资料持续补齐
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY 模型探索,从这里开始

找到适合你的 AI 模型。

从语言到影像,从开源到 API。读懂模型能力、比较真实成本,
为你的下一个想法,找到合适的智能引擎。

热门探索
84,999 款模型档案13202 家厂商 / 发布者45 个能力分类465 款有可比报价 · 30 款有公开评测
T文本生成▧图像生成▷视频生成⌘代码生成◖语音合成♫音乐生成⬡3D 建模▤文档分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

探索 AI 模型 2428

为你发现值得关注的模型

**la_core_web_md**: Latin NLP pipeline for spaCy. Trained on harmonized Universal Dependencies treebanks (Perseus, PROIEL, ITTB, LLCT, UDante, CIRCSE) with LASLA data. Includes POS tagging, morphological analysis, lemmatization, dependency parsing, named entity recognition, and sentence segmentation. « Catus » — from "De cato seu fele" in Conrad Gesner's Historiae animalium liber primus de quadrupedibus viviparis (1551), p. 318 This is a maintenance release across the LatinCy pipeline family (`la_core_web_sm`/`md`/`lg`/`trf`). Model weights are **unchanged** from v3.9.x — no retraining. It also carries the 3.9.7 fix, which was built but never published. Evaluation metrics are not re-measured: the current test set (treebanks 3.10.13) differs from the one these weights were scored on, so the `meta.json` figures remain the v3.9 measurement.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

turnsense

latishab

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

OpenLID

laurievb

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

OpenLID-v2

laurievb

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model is a fine-tuned version of monologg/koelectra-small-v3-discriminator on an unknown dataset. It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.1431 - Precision: 0.8232 - Recall: 0.8449 - F1: 0.8339 - Accuracy: 0.9628 태깅 시스템 : BIO 시스템 - B-(begin) : 개체명이 시작할 때 - I-(inside) : 토큰이 개체명 중간에 있을 때 - O(outside) : 토큰이 개체명이 아닐 경우 개체명 인식(NER) 모델 학습 데이터 셋 - 문화체육관광부 > 국립국어원 > 모두의 말뭉치 > 개체명 분석 말뭉치 2021 - https://corpus.korean.go.kr/request/reausetMain.do

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

PIGuard

leolee99

- Website: https://injecguard.github.io/ - Paper: https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.1468.pdf - Code Repo: https://github.com/leolee99/PIGuard Due to some licensing issues, the model name has been changed from **InjecGuard** to **PIGuard**. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Prompt injection attacks pose a critical threat to large language models (LLMs), enabling goal hijacking and data leakage. Prompt guard models, though effective in defense, suffer from over-defense—falsely flagging benign inputs as malicious due to trigger word bias. To address this issue, we introduce ***NotInject***, an evaluation dataset that systematically measures over-defense across various prompt guard models. NotInject contains 339 benign samples enriched with trigger words common in prompt injection attacks, enabling fine-grained evaluation. Our results show that state-of-the-art models suffer from over-defense issues, with accuracy dropping close to random guessing levels (60\%). To mitigate this, we propose ***PIGuard***, a novel prompt guard model that incorporates a new training strategy, *Mitigating Over-defense for Free* (MOF), which significantly reduces the bias on trigger words. InjecGuard demonstrates state-of-the-art performance on diverse benchmarks including NotInject, surpassing the existing best model by 30.8\%, offering a robust and open-source solution for detecting prompt injection attacks.

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

This model is a fine-tuned version of neuralmind/bert-base-portuguese-cased It achieves the following results on the evaluation set: - Loss: 0.1140 - Precision: 0.9147 - Recall: 0.9483 - F1: 0.9312 - Accuracy: 0.9700 This model was fine-tunned on token classification task (NER) on Portuguese archival documents. The annotated labels are: Date, Profession, Person, Place, Organization All the training and evaluation data is available at: http://ner.epl.di.uminho.pt/

译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗

PtVId

liaad

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充

输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗
来源 / 文档 ↗
COST EXPLORER

好模型,也要算好成本。

费用分析

调整月度 Token 用量,直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。

1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价

使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照;不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费,请以来源的当前报价为准。

MODEL HANDBOOK

读懂模型,再做选择

选型与常见问题
API 价格应该怎么比较?+

先区分输入、输出和缓存价格,再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费,不能直接与 Token 单价比较。

开放权重,就代表可以免费商用吗?+

不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。

排行榜第一,就是最适合我的模型吗?+

榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本,再选择模型。

AI NEWS · 从信息到选择

资讯看趋势,工具提效率,模型筑可能。

探索 AI 资讯 ↗发现 AI 工具 ↗