deberta-v3-base-rte
cliang1453基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗DISCOVER & COMPARE
探索 AI 模型 2428
distilroberta-base-climate-commitment
climatebert基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗distilroberta-base-climate-detector
climatebert基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗distilroberta-base-climate-sentiment
climatebert基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗distilroberta-base-climate-specificity
climatebert基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗distilroberta-base-climate-tcfd
climatebert基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗environmental-claims
climatebert基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗distilcamembert-base-ner
cmarkeaWe present DistilCamemBERT-NER, which is DistilCamemBERT fine-tuned for the NER (Named Entity Recognition) task for the French language. The work is inspired by Jean-Baptiste/camembert-ner based on the CamemBERT model. The problem of the modelizations based on CamemBERT is at the scaling moment, for the production phase, for example. Indeed, inference cost can be a technological issue. To counteract this effect, we propose this modelization which **divides the inference time by two** with the same consumption power thanks to DistilCamemBERT. This model performance is compared to 2 reference models (see below) with the metric f1 score. For the mean inference time measure, an AMD Ryzen 5 4500U @ 2.3GHz with 6 cores was used:
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗We present DistilCamemBERT-Sentiment, which is DistilCamemBERT fine-tuned for the sentiment analysis task for the French language. This model is built using two datasets: Amazon Reviews and Allociné.fr to minimize the bias. Indeed, Amazon reviews are similar in messages and relatively shorts, contrary to Allociné critics, who are long and rich texts. This modelization is close to tblard/tf-allocine based on CamemBERT model. The problem of the modelizations based on CamemBERT is at the scaling moment, for the production phase, for example. Indeed, inference cost can be a technological issue. To counteract this effect, we propose this modelization which **divides the inference time by two** with the same consumption power thanks to DistilCamemBERT. The dataset comprises 204,993 reviews for training and 4,999 reviews for the test from Amazon, and 235,516 and 4,729 critics from Allocine website. The dataset is labeled into five categories:
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗biolinkbert-mednli
cnut1648基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗promptguard
codeintegrity-ai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗This model is distilled from the zero-shot classification pipeline on the unlabeled GoEmotions dataset using this script. It was trained with mixed precision for 10 epochs and otherwise used the default script arguments. The model can be used like any other model trained on GoEmotions, but will likely not perform as well as a model trained with full supervision. It is primarily intended as a demo of how an expensive NLI-based zero-shot model can be distilled to a more efficient student, allowing a classifier to be trained with only unlabeled data. Note that although the GoEmotions dataset allow multiple labels per instance, the teacher used single-label classification to create psuedo-labels.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗roberta-large-cola-krishna2020
cointegrated基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗rubert-tiny-sentiment-balanced
cointegratedThis is the cointegrated/rubert-tiny model fine-tuned for classification of sentiment for short Russian texts. The problem is formulated as multiclass classification: `negative` vs `neutral` vs `positive`. We trained the model on the datasets collected by Smetanin. We have converted all training data into a 3-class format and have up- and downsampled the training data to balance both the sources and the classes. The training code is available as a Colab notebook. The metrics on the balanced test set are the following:
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗rubert-tiny-toxicity
cointegratedThis is the cointegrated/rubert-tiny model fine-tuned for classification of toxicity and inappropriateness for short informal Russian texts, such as comments in social networks. The problem is formulated as multilabel classification with the following classes: - `non-toxic`: the text does NOT contain insults, obscenities, and threats, in the sense of the OK ML Cup competition. - `insult` - `obscenity` - `threat` - `dangerous`: the text is inappropriate, in the sense of Babakov et.al., i.e. it can harm the reputation of the speaker. The function below estimates the probability that the text is either toxic OR dangerous:
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗rubert-tiny2-cedr-emotion-detection
cointegratedThis is the cointegrated/rubert-tiny2 model fine-tuned for classification of emotions in Russian sentences. The task is multilabel classification, because one sentence can contain multiple emotions. The model on the CEDR dataset described in the paper "Data-Driven Model for Emotion Detection in Russian Texts" by Sboev et al. The model has been trained with Adam optimizer for 40 epochs with learning rate `1e-5` and batch size 64 in this notebook.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗open-jev-deberta-v3-large
com-kotobalabs基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗laya
convaiinnovations**Multilingual, non-autoregressive System 1 decision model.** Give it a **state** (text, email, ticket, or JSON) and **typed questions**; it returns typed answers with mathematically calibrated probabilities in a single forward pass (~33 ms) across 100+ languages. Trained with reinforcement learning against strictly proper scoring rules (**RLCD**), so reporting honest probabilities is the only way to maximise reward. It never generates text, so there is nothing to parse and nothing to hallucinate. Python 3.10 or newer. Optional extras: `laya[serve]` (HTTP server), `laya[mcp]` (MCP server), `laya[langchain]` (LangChain and LangGraph), `laya[onnx]` (ONNX Runtime), `laya[fast]` (TileLang GPU fast path). Platform-by-platform setup is in the GitHub README. **Long documents.** `laya-multilingual` reads up to 8,192 tokens with `max_len=8192`. Measured accuracy and time by document length (benchmark script):
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗laya-multilingual
convaiinnovationsNon-autoregressive **System 1 decision model** covering 100+ languages. Give it a **state** (text, email, ticket, or JSON) and **typed questions**; it returns typed answers with probabilities in a single forward pass. No text generation, so nothing to parse and nothing to hallucinate. Part of the Laya family — **use this checkpoint for anything that is not English.** > **Long documents: `laya-multilingual` reads up to 8,192 tokens.** It ships with a 1,024-token limit that cuts long documents off, so pass `max_len=8192` for them: > > > > In the table below, 16 to 18 of 20 requests were answered correctly with up to about 4,000 tokens of text before them; beyond that results vary (8 to 17 of 20), so check long-document accuracy on your own data. Short inputs give identical answers with `max_len=8192`, and speed follows the input's real length, not the limit: short inputs are unchanged, and a 4,000-token input takes about 1.7 s on an Apple GPU.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗laya-typed-decisions
convaiinnovationsNon-autoregressive **System 1 decision model**, fine-tuned on the typed-decisions workflows: agent-trace observability, customer service, invoice processing and security incidents. **+3.9 points over Jev's published 0.727, above the 0.735 teacher ceiling**, with 2.4x better Brier and 1.6x better score MAE. Jev figures are third-party published, not measured here — there is no TypeSafe API access in this project, and sample sizes and prompts differ. Treat the comparison as indicative.
译文排队中 · 当前显示来源原文
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗deberta-v3-large_toxicity-scorer
cooperleong00基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础资料已收录 · 缺失资料后续补充
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
输入 文本→ 输出 文本
价格待核验多模态与渠道费用须分别核对
查看详情 ↗暂未找到匹配模型
可以调整厂商、分类或输入输出条件；新模型正持续收录。
COST EXPLORER
好模型，也要算好成本。
调整月度 Token 用量，直观比较不同模型的预估 API 开支。
1 M = 100 万 Token · 美元计价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价
仅比较同一渠道的基础文本 Token 报价
使用已采集且单位可比的 USD / 百万 Token 渠道报价。报价为采集时快照；不计缓存优惠、阶梯价、推理额外输出与税费，请以来源的当前报价为准。
MODEL HANDBOOK
读懂模型，再做选择
API 价格应该怎么比较？+
先区分输入、输出和缓存价格，再使用同一任务和用量估算总费用。图像、音频和视频可能按张、时长或分辨率计费，不能直接与 Token 单价比较。
开放权重，就代表可以免费商用吗？+
不一定。必须逐一核对具体模型版本的许可证、商用限制及使用政策。自己部署还需要考虑显存、推理资源和运维费用。
排行榜第一，就是最适合我的模型吗？+
榜单取决于测试任务、版本与评测方法。建议用实际业务样本比较准确性、时延、稳定性和成本，再选择模型。