MODEL PROFILE · 模型档案

lucida

egeorcun · lucida

Lucida is a BiRefNet-based background-removal / image-matting model fine-tuned to excel where most open models fail: **camouflaged objects, transparent materials (glass), text & logos, VFX glows, and illustrations** — while staying competitive everywhere else. On our 203-image, 9-category benchmark (MAE, lower is better) Lucida leads every model we tested — including a commercial reference — in **camouflage (0.0270)** and **illustration (0.0092)**, beats the commercial reference in **text/logo preservation (0.0091 vs 0.0123)** and in **print-design/sticker art (0.0235 — 2x better than every model measured)**, and sets our best-ever **transparency-in-mixed-objects** handling and **overall (0.0257)** score — ahead of every model we measured, specialist or commercial, on the 203-image average. Full benchmark, gallery and training recipe: **https://github.com/egeorcun/lucida** — or try the live demo. > **Changelog note (2026-07-24):** an experimental v13 build was published for a day and then > reverted — community testing showed it regressed on real-world layered artwork > (poster/collage-style illustrations) that our synthetic design test set does not cover. > The current weights are the proven v7. The v13 improvements (reduced background haze on > real photos, a transparency milestone) will return in v14 together with the fix.

译文排队中,当前展示来源原文。

图像分割license:mit
上下文窗口来源未披露
输入 → 输出图像 → 图像
模型权重待核验
档案更新时间2026/10/30 02:39:46
OVERVIEW

模型介绍

Lucida is a BiRefNet-based background-removal / image-matting model fine-tuned to excel where most open models fail: **camouflaged objects, transparent materials (glass), text & logos, VFX glows, and illustrations** — while staying competitive everywhere else. On our 203-image, 9-category benchmark (MAE, lower is better) Lucida leads every model we tested — including a commercial reference — in **camouflage (0.0270)** and **illustration (0.0092)**, beats the commercial reference in **text/logo preservation (0.0091 vs 0.0123)** and in **print-design/sticker art (0.0235 — 2x better than every model measured)**, and sets our best-ever **transparency-in-mixed-objects** handling and **overall (0.0257)** score — ahead of every model we measured, specialist or commercial, on the 203-image average. Full benchmark, gallery and training recipe: **https://github.com/egeorcun/lucida** — or try the live demo. > **Changelog note (2026-07-24):** an experimental v13 build was published for a day and then > reverted — community testing showed it regressed on real-world layered artwork > (poster/collage-style illustrations) that our synthetic design test set does not cover. > The current weights are the proven v7. The v13 improvements (reduced background haze on > real photos, a transparency milestone) will return in v14 together with the fix.

主要特点

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

局限与注意事项

暂无足够来源支持具体缺点结论。请重点验证实际任务表现、时延、数据政策、许可与版本生命周期。

PRICING & COST

来源报价与费用分析

同一模型在不同渠道、地区和配置下可能采用不同价格。下表独立保留各渠道报价,不将渠道价格视为厂商官方统一价格。

来源 / 渠道输入输出计费单位采集时间
暂未取得可核验报价,请查阅来源渠道。

按月估算基础 Token 费用

—

预估不包含缓存优惠、阶梯定价、多模态附加费用、网络检索、税费及推理额外输出。

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

公开评测与运行配置

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

查看完整已收录榜单 →

常见问题

开放权重是否代表可以免费商用?

不一定。应核对具体版本许可证、商用门槛和使用政策。自部署还会产生算力和维护成本。

这些价格是实时结算价格吗?

不是实时结算价格,而是带采集时间的来源报价快照。请到对应渠道核对当前版本、区域、折扣和计费方式。

资料来源与可追溯记录

许可证:mit。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。