AI NEWS・モデル情報能力を知り、根拠ある選択を。 ↗基本情報を先に収録・詳細を随時追加
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY ここからモデルを探す

あなたに合う AIモデルを。

言語から画像、オープンウェイトからAPIまで。能力と実際の費用を比較。
次のアイデアに合うAIを見つけましょう。

人気の検索
84,836 件のモデル13097 社の提供元・公開者45 件の機能分類465件の比較可能な料金・30件の公開評価
Tテキスト生成▧画像生成▷動画生成⌘コード生成◖音声合成♫音楽生成⬡3Dモデリング▤文書分析
DISCOVER & COMPARE

AIモデルを探す 84836

注目のモデルを見つける

> **Updated 2026-10-13: `AP-Q5_K_M`.** Same file name, size and tensor types, better weights from an improved encode: > KL divergence **0.0771** and top-1 agreement **86.95 %** on held-out text, **0.0181** on code: > level with unsloth's UD-Q4_K_XL on held-out text and ahead on code, in the same VRAM. Download the file again. > > **Updated 2026-10-12: `AP-Q4_K_XL`.** KL divergence **0.0886** and top-1 agreement **86.14 %** on held-out text, > **0.0206** on code. 0 loops in a 45-run loop stress test. Quantized for accuracy per gigabyte of VRAM, and measured — every tier below is scored against the same reference on a held-out corpus. Method and full results . Each tier varies the quant type per tensor group rather than using one type throughout, to get the most accuracy per gigabyte of VRAM.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

> **Updated 2026-10-13: both files.** Same file names, sizes and tensor types, better weights from an improved encode. This is huihui-ai/Huihui-Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-abliterated encoded the same way as our Gyro files. Abliteration is huihui-ai's work: it removes the refusal direction from the model's weights. We only quantized it. **Which setup fits your hardware, NVIDIA and AMD instructions, context limits, vision and speculative decoding are all on the main Gyro card and apply unchanged here; only the file names differ.**

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is a 125B mixture-of-experts model, the kind that normally needs a workstation full of GPUs. Gyro-Coder brings it to a single RTX 3090, 4090 or 7900 XTX: 19.9 GiB of GPU memory. **New: Gyro-Coder-L for 32 GB cards.** The same experts at about 3.2 bits per weight: 27.5 GiB of GPU memory, and closer to the full model than Gyro-Coder on every set we measure. On C++ it is closer than Gyro-M, which keeps all 512 experts. **Updated 2026-10-29: Gyro-Coder-L v1.2** (`Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Gyro-Coder-L-TQ3_0.gguf`, same name and size). Thanks to a detailed community report, three experts that matter for tool calls and symbols are back in the expert set, in place of three that did less. Tool calls no longer break under sampling: across 100 `<parameter=` sites in real agent sessions, v1.0 wrote a broken tag at 4 and v1.2 at none. Roman numerals are fixed too, and KLD is unchanged on every set. v1.2 replaces both v1.0 and the v1.1 preview.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

**Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (125B MoE) on one GPU: 27.6 GiB for a 32 GB card, 35 GiB for 48 GB, 50 GiB for 64 GB.** The best quality per GiB at every size we ship. Gyro-S fits a 32 GB card: 27.64 GiB of weights, 28.8 GiB at 64k context, up to 128k context. Coding on a 24 GB card: agentionai/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Gyro-Coder-GGUF. Abliterated Gyro-S and Gyro-M: agentionai/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Gyro-abliterated-Huihui-GGUF. The routed experts are stored in a rotated basis with our own rotor code (Agention Precision Rotor, APR). The `TQ1_0` / `TQ2_0` / `TQ3_0` in the names is only a size class for the Hub (the experts use the trellis types TQK6/TQK7, TQ2_T and TQP5-7). **Upstream llama.cpp cannot load these files yet.** They run in:

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

A 180 B model that runs **entirely on the GPU** of a 128 GB unified-memory box — 87.06 GiB at 4.23 bpw, within 2.5% perplexity of the unquantized model. Sized for the 96 GiB VRAM carve-out of a Strix Halo (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 / Radeon 8060S). *Throughput against context depth, against our closest mainline-compatible quant run on both this fork and stock llama.cpp — numbers and discussion under Holding up at long context.* - **Everything stays on the GPU.** Not the experts, not the 51.2 B-parameter n-gram table. No host-RAM fallback, no CPU compute in the hot path. - **Fast prefill that holds at depth** — 423 t/s at 512 tokens, 357 t/s at 8k, still 245 t/s at 32k and 138 t/s at 128k. Prefill is compute-bound and the ROCmFP4 types are cheaper to dequantize. Matters most for long prompts, agentic loops, and anything that re-reads a large context. - **Better perplexity than that same mainline tier**, by about two standard errors, and better than AesSedai's IQ4_XS and IQ3_S at 20–30 GB smaller. - **Vision included** — the model's own tower, at f16, losslessly converted. - **Speculative decoding included** — the model's own MTP head. Up to **40 tok/s generation** observed on a Strix Halo with adaptive drafting; acceptance is content-dependent, so the rate moves with what you are generating. - **imatrix-calibrated** on 1540 chunks from two corpora, so the low-bit tensors are fitted to real activations rather than assumed.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

Signal-3.8-27B

agentionai

> [!IMPORTANT] > **Update 2026-09-13 — use these settings for stable, short reasoning** > Temperature 0.6, min-p 0.05 (top-p 0.95, top-k 20), KV cache q8_0 or f16, and the MTP draft head on. > Without min-p, long answers can run away into repetition on some draws; a 4-bit value cache makes that > deterministic. Both are fixed by the settings above, on Signal and on the base model alike. > [!WARNING] > The weights in this repository were updated on 2026-09-13 (the GGUF tiers were rebuilt from them). The first release's tiers could, rarely, > repeat an answer line when sampling without the draft head; the rebuilt tiers showed no loop or cap > in 55 traces under the same conditions. If you downloaded before that date, re-download. AgentionAI Signal is a minimally invasive fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B designed for lower generation latency and better token efficiency. On our held-out general-prompt evaluation, Signal produces **57% fewer answer tokens** and uses **52% fewer thinking tokens**, while matching or improving the measured answer quality of the base model.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

> [!IMPORTANT] > **Recommended settings** > Temperature 0.6, top-p 0.95, top-k 20, min-p 0.05, **presence_penalty 1.0**, KV cache q8_0 or f16. > Keep min-p and presence_penalty on: without them, long generations can run into repetition on some > draws (a 4-bit value cache makes that deterministic). If you enable the MTP draft head on recent > mainline llama.cpp, also pass **`--no-spec-draft-backend-sampling`** — the default backend draft > sampling does not apply your sampler to accepted draft tokens, which can let repetition run away > regardless of the settings above. > [!WARNING] > The tiers in this repository were rebuilt on 2026-09-13. The first release's tiers could, rarely, > repeat an answer line when sampling without the draft head; the rebuilt tiers showed no loop or cap > in 55 traces under the same conditions. If you downloaded before that date, re-download. AgentionAI Signal is a minimally invasive fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B designed for lower generation latency and better token efficiency. On our held-out general-prompt evaluation, Signal produces **25% fewer answer tokens** and uses **41% fewer thinking tokens**, while matching or improving the measured answer quality of the base model.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

AgentionAI Signal is a minimally invasive fine-tune of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next for lower latency and better token efficiency. On MATH-500 it spends **26% fewer reasoning tokens** than the base model with **half as many hesitation markers**, and scores higher (99.2% against 97.5%). As a coding agent on Terminal-Bench 2.0 it finishes the same tasks in **25% less wall time**. With speculative decoding it is faster still: the multi-token-prediction drafter agrees with Signal 90% of the time against 69% for the base model, so more tokens are accepted per forward pass. Signal gets there by being direct, not by cutting corners. Reasoning models spend a large share of their tokens on hesitation and re-checking rather than on new steps. Signal keeps every step that does work and drops the ones that only describe the process, and in answers it drops preambles, sign-offs, excess formatting and narration while keeping the substance. The 177B mixture-of-experts backbone, the vision encoder and the multi-token-prediction draft head all work exactly as in the base model, so it is a drop-in replacement. Signal is trained by self-distillation, on Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's own answers generated under an instruction to be direct that the released model no longer needs. No external data and no other model's outputs went into it, so it keeps the base model's knowledge and voice intact.

翻訳待ち・原文を表示

入力 テキスト · 画像→ 出力 テキスト
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

QwenPaw-Flash-9B

agentscope-ai

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

基本情報を収録・詳細は順次追加

分類準備中
入力 未確認→ 出力 未確認
料金未確認マルチモーダル・チャネル料金は個別に確認
詳細を見る ↗
出典・文書 ↗
COST EXPLORER

モデル選びに、費用の視点も。

コスト分析

月間トークン数を調整してAPI費用を比較。

1 M = 100万トークン・米ドル
同一チャネルの基本テキスト料金を比較

収集済みの比較可能な100万トークン当たり米ドル料金です。キャッシュ割引、段階料金、追加推論出力、税金は含みません。最新料金は出典で確認してください。

MODEL HANDBOOK

モデルを理解して選ぶ

選び方とよくある質問
API料金はどう比較しますか?+

入力・出力・キャッシュ料金を分け、同じ用途と使用量で総費用を比較します。画像・音声・動画は枚数、時間、解像度で課金される場合があります。

オープンウェイトは無料で商用利用できますか?+

必ずしもそうではありません。バージョンごとのライセンス、商用制限、ポリシーを確認してください。自前運用には計算資源と保守費用も必要です。

ランキング1位が最適ですか?+

順位はテスト、バージョン、評価方法によります。実際の業務データで精度、遅延、安定性、費用を比較してください。

AI NEWS・情報から選択へ

ニュースで知り、ツールで効率化、モデルで可能性を。

AIニュースを読む ↗AIツールを探す ↗