モデル情報

vulnerability-severity-classification-roberta-base

CIRCL · vulnerability-severity-classification-roberta-base

The model was presented in the paper VLAI: A RoBERTa-Based Model for Automated Vulnerability Severity Classification [arXiv]. **Abstract:** VLAI is a transformer-based model that predicts software vulnerability severity levels directly from text descriptions. Built on RoBERTa, VLAI is fine-tuned on over 600,000 real-world vulnerabilities and achieves over 82% accuracy in predicting severity categories, enabling faster and more consistent triage ahead of manual CVSS scoring. The model and dataset are open-source and integrated into the Vulnerability-Lookup service. > **Note (October 2026):** since VulnTrain 3.4.0, > the dataset is split so that records of the same vulnerability (for example a CVE and its > GitHub advisory) never appear in both train and test. Accuracy measured this way (**74%**) > reflects performance on vulnerabilities the model has never seen. Earlier figures, including > the one in the abstract above, were measured on a split where many test descriptions also > appeared in training. Details in the technical report > Improving vulnerability-scores: Leakage-Free Splits and Consistent CVSS 4.0 Scoring.

翻訳待ちのため原文を表示しています。

テキスト分析license:cc-by-4.0
コンテキスト長非公開
入力 → 出力テキスト → テキスト
モデルウェイト未確認
情報更新日時2026/10/31 00:25:47
OVERVIEW

モデル紹介

The model was presented in the paper VLAI: A RoBERTa-Based Model for Automated Vulnerability Severity Classification [arXiv]. **Abstract:** VLAI is a transformer-based model that predicts software vulnerability severity levels directly from text descriptions. Built on RoBERTa, VLAI is fine-tuned on over 600,000 real-world vulnerabilities and achieves over 82% accuracy in predicting severity categories, enabling faster and more consistent triage ahead of manual CVSS scoring. The model and dataset are open-source and integrated into the Vulnerability-Lookup service. > **Note (October 2026):** since VulnTrain 3.4.0, > the dataset is split so that records of the same vulnerability (for example a CVE and its > GitHub advisory) never appear in both train and test. Accuracy measured this way (**74%**) > reflects performance on vulnerabilities the model has never seen. Earlier figures, including > the one in the abstract above, were measured on a split where many test descriptions also > appeared in training. Details in the technical report > Improving vulnerability-scores: Leakage-Free Splits and Consistent CVSS 4.0 Scoring.

主な特徴

特点摘要待依据来源补齐,不凭模型名称推断能力。

制約と注意点

具体的な制約を判断する出典が不足しています。実際の性能、遅延、データ方針、ライセンス、提供期間を確認してください。

PRICING & COST

出典別料金と費用分析

料金はチャネル・地域・設定によって異なります。各チャネルの料金は個別に表示し、提供元の統一公式料金とは見なしません。

出典・チャネル入力出力課金単位収集日時
確認可能な料金がありません。出典を確認してください。

月額の基本トークン費用を試算

—

試算はキャッシュ割引、段階料金、マルチモーダル追加料金、検索、税金、追加推論出力を含みません。

INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS

公開評価と実行設定

暂无已采集的可核验公开评分。模型未上榜不代表能力较低。

収録済みの全ランキング →

よくある質問

オープンウェイトなら無料で商用利用できますか?

必ずしもそうではありません。バージョン別のライセンス、商用条件、利用方針を確認してください。自前運用には計算資源と保守費用も必要です。

これはリアルタイムの請求料金ですか?

収集日時付きの料金スナップショットです。最新のバージョン、地域、割引、課金方式は各チャネルで確認してください。

出典と追跡記録

许可证:cc-by-4.0。模型介绍与第三方评测均以原来源的具体版本和方法为准。