AI NEWS.ccAI is happening. The future is updating.
♡ Saved tools 0
AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,737 model profiles13040 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 1038

Discover models worth your attention

Apertus is a 70B and 8B parameter language model designed to push the boundaries of fully-open multilingual and transparent models. The model supports over 1000 languages and long context, it uses only fully compliant and open training data, and achieves comparable performance to models trained behind closed doors. The model is a decoder-only transformer, pretrained on 15T tokens with a staged curriculum of web, code and math data. The model uses a new xIELU activation function and is trained from scratch with the AdEMAMix optimizer. Post-training included supervised fine-tuning and alignment via QRPO. The modeling code for Apertus is available in transformers `v4.56.0` and later, so make sure to upgrade your transformers version. You can also load the model with the latest `vLLM` which uses transformers as a backend.

Text generation
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Visual QA
Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Visual QA
Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

Beam is an open model built by Reflection. Beam takes text as input and generates text as output. This release includes the instruction-tuned model in BF16, FP8, and NVFP4 numerics. Beam uses a sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture with 501B total parameters and 23B active parameters. It supports a context window of 1M tokens and was developed predominantly for English. Beam models are designed to deliver strong performance for areas such as agentic tool use, coding and general reasoning with an emphasis on token efficient usage. These models were evaluated against a large collection of different datasets and metrics to cover different aspects of text generation. Evaluation results marked in the table are for instruction-tuned models spanning all released numerics. Note: All evaluations were done using temp=0.7, top_p=0.99.

Text generation
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

bge-m3

unsloth

In this project, we introduce BGE-M3, which is distinguished for its versatility in Multi-Functionality, Multi-Linguality, and Multi-Granularity. - Multi-Functionality: It can simultaneously perform the three common retrieval functionalities of embedding model: dense retrieval, multi-vector retrieval, and sparse retrieval. - Multi-Linguality: It can support more than 100 working languages. - Multi-Granularity: It is able to process inputs of different granularities, spanning from short sentences to long documents of up to 8192 tokens. We recommend to use the following pipeline: hybrid retrieval + re-ranking. - Hybrid retrieval leverages the strengths of various methods, offering higher accuracy and stronger generalization capabilities. A classic example: using both embedding retrieval and the BM25 algorithm. Now, you can try to use BGE-M3, which supports both embedding and sparse retrieval. This allows you to obtain token weights (similar to the BM25) without any additional cost when generate dense embeddings. To use hybrid retrieval, you can refer to Vespa and Milvus. The previous test results were lower because we mistakenly removed the passages that have the same id as the query from the search results. After correcting this mistake, the overall performance of BGE-M3 on MIRACL is higher than the previous results, but the experimental conclusion remains unchanged. The other results are not affected by this mistake. To reproduce the previous lower results, you need to add the `--remove-query` parameter when using `pyserini.search.faiss` or `pyserini.search.lucene` to search the passages.

Embeddings & similarity
Input Text→ Output Embedding
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

Model List | FAQ | Usage | Evaluation | Train | Contact | Citation | License More details please refer to our Github: FlagEmbedding. If you are looking for a model that supports more languages, longer texts, and other retrieval methods, you can try using bge-m3.

Embeddings & similarity
Input Text→ Output Embedding
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

Model List | FAQ | Usage | Evaluation | Train | Contact | Citation | License More details please refer to our Github: FlagEmbedding. If you are looking for a model that supports more languages, longer texts, and other retrieval methods, you can try using bge-m3.

Embeddings & similarity
Input Text→ Output Embedding
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗

基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Text generation
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
Source / docs ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗