T-lite-it-1.0
t-tech基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
**🚨 Users are advised to exercise caution and are responsible for any additional training and oversight required to ensure the model's responses meet acceptable ethical and safety standards. The responsibility for incorporating this model into industrial or commercial solutions lies entirely with those who choose to deploy it.** T-lite-it-2.1 is an efficient Russian model built upon the Qwen 3 architecture, featuring significant improvements in instruction following and **adds support for tool-calling capabilities** — a key advancement over T-lite-it-1.0, which lacks tool-use support. Outperforms Qwen3-8B in tool calling scenarios, which is essential for agentic applications. Built for both general tasks and complex workflows, with higher Russian text generation throughput enabled by optimized tokenizer. **NOTE: This model supports only non-thinking mode and does not generate ` ` in its output. Meanwhile, specifying `enable_thinking=False` is no longer required.**
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
**🚨 Users are advised to exercise caution and are responsible for any additional training and oversight required to ensure the model's responses meet acceptable ethical and safety standards. The responsibility for incorporating this model into industrial or commercial solutions lies entirely with those who choose to deploy it.** This repository contains **T-lite-it-2.1** converted to the **GGUF** format with llama.cpp. See the original BF16 model here: t-tech/T-lite-it-2.1. T-lite-it-2.1 is an efficient Russian model built upon the Qwen 3 architecture, featuring significant improvements in instruction following and **adds support for tool-calling capabilities** — a key advancement over T-lite-it-1.0, which lacks tool-use support. Outperforms Qwen3-8B in tool calling scenarios, which is essential for agentic applications. Built for both general tasks and complex workflows, with higher Russian text generation throughput enabled by optimized tokenizer.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
> **Main BF16 model:** t-tech/T-pro-it-2.0 **🚨 Users are advised to exercise caution and are responsible for any additional training and oversight required to ensure the model's responses meet acceptable ethical and safety standards. The responsibility for incorporating this model into industrial or commercial solutions lies entirely with those who choose to deploy it.** T‑pro‑it‑2.0‑AWQ is a fine‑grained AWQ‑quantised version of **T‑pro‑it‑2.0** (built on the Qwen‑3 family). AWQ 4-bit (W4A16_ASYM) offers comparable performance with approximately one-quarter the memory footprint and significantly faster inference.
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
**🚨 T-Search-GGUF is designed for use with the official T-Search harness. The source T-Search checkpoint did not show noticeable differences relative to the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B base model on general-purpose benchmarks.** **🚨 Users are advised to exercise caution and are responsible for any additional training and oversight required to ensure the model's responses meet acceptable ethical and safety standards. The responsibility for incorporating this model into industrial or commercial solutions lies entirely with those who choose to deploy it.** We introduce **T-Search-GGUF**, a set of GGUF quantizations of the T-Search agentic retriever for difficult multi-step search in English and Russian. T-Search plans and executes searches across multiple rounds with a configurable search budget.
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.