AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,838 model profiles13099 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 2

Discover models worth your attention

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

* A RoBERTa [[Liu et al., 2019]](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.11692.pdf) model fine-tuned for de-identification of medical notes. * Sequence Labeling (token classification): The model was trained to predict protected health information (PHI/PII) entities (spans). A list of protected health information categories is given by HIPAA. * A token can either be classified as non-PHI or as one of the 11 PHI types. Token predictions are aggregated to spans by making use of BILOU tagging. * The PHI labels that were used for training and other details can be found here: Annotation Guidelines * More details on how to use this model, the format of data and other useful information is present in the GitHub repo: Robust DeID. * A demo on how the model works (using model predictions to de-identify a medical note) is on this space: Medical-Note-Deidentification. * Steps on how this model can be used to run a forward pass can be found here: Forward Pass * In brief, the steps are: * Sentencize (the model aggregates the sentences back to the note level) and tokenize the dataset. * Use the predict function of this model to gather the predictions (i.e., predictions for each token). * Additionally, the model predictions can be used to remove PHI from the original note/text. * The I2B2 2014 [[Stubbs and Uzuner, 2015]](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978170/) dataset was used to train this model.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗