基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Explore AI models 9
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
GUI-Owl 1.5 is the next-generation native GUI agent model family built on Qwen3-VL. It supports multi-platform GUI automation across desktops, mobile devices, browsers, and more. Powered by a scalable hybrid data flywheel, unified agent capability enhancement, and multi-platform environment RL (MRPO), GUI-Owl 1.5 offers a full spectrum of models. **Key highlights:** - 🏆 **State-of-the-art** among multi-platform GUI models on OSWorld-Verified, AndroidWorld, Mobile-World, WindowsAA, ScreenSpot-v2, ScreenSpot-Pro, and more. - 🔧 **Tool & MCP calling**: Native support for external tool invocation and MCP server coordination, achieving top performance on OSWorld-MCP and Mobile-World. - 🧠 **Long-horizon memory**: Built-in memory capability without external workflow orchestration, leading all native agent models on MemGUI-Bench. - 🤝 **Multi-agent ready**: Serves both as a standalone end-to-end agent and as specialized roles (planner, executor, verifier, notetaker) within the Mobile-Agent-v3.5 framework. - ⚡ **Instruct & Thinking variants**: Smaller instruct models for fast inference and edge deployment; larger thinking models for complex tasks requiring planning and reflection. Please refer to the technical report for detailed results on ScreenSpot-v2, ScreenSpot-Pro, OSWorld-G, MMBench-GUI, and more.
GUI-Owl-1.5-8B-Think
mPLUGGUI-Owl 1.5 is the next-generation native GUI agent model family built on Qwen3-VL. It supports multi-platform GUI automation across desktops, mobile devices, browsers, and more. Powered by a scalable hybrid data flywheel, unified agent capability enhancement, and multi-platform environment RL (MRPO), GUI-Owl 1.5 offers a full spectrum of models. * **Paper**: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16855 * **GitHub Repository**: https://github.com/X-PLUG/MobileAgent * **Online Demo**: http://modelscope.cn/studios/MobileAgentTest/computer_use **Key highlights:** - 🏆 **State-of-the-art** among multi-platform GUI models on OSWorld-Verified, AndroidWorld, Mobile-World, WindowsAA, ScreenSpot-v2, ScreenSpot-Pro, and more. - 🔧 **Tool & MCP calling**: Native support for external tool invocation and MCP server coordination, achieving top performance on OSWorld-MCP and Mobile-World. - 🧠 **Long-horizon memory**: Built-in memory capability without external workflow orchestration, leading all native agent models on MemGUI-Bench. - 🤝 **Multi-agent ready**: Serves both as a standalone end-to-end agent and as specialized roles (planner, executor, verifier, notetaker) within the Mobile-Agent-v3.5 framework. - ⚡ **Instruct & Thinking variants**: Smaller instruct models for fast inference and edge deployment; larger thinking models for complex tasks requiring planning and reflection.
GUI-Owl-7B
mPLUG基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
mPLUG-Owl3-7B-240728
mPLUG基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
TinyChart-3B-768
mPLUG基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
No matching models
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
Great models. Clear costs.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
Understand before you choose
How should API prices be compared?+
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Do open weights mean free commercial use?+
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.