AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,991 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 1

Discover models worth your attention

**OpenJev (Verdict)** is an open-source, post-trained foundational decision model built for structured software workflows, inspired by **TypeSafe AI's Jev** and **Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions (RLCD)**. It provides calibrated semantic judgments (discrete choices, ordinal scores, and binary probabilities) in a single forward pass without conversational text generation. - **GitHub Repository**: https://github.com/Heman10x-NGU/Verdict-open-jev - **Base Architecture**: ModernBERT-base (`knowledgator/gliclass-modern-base-v2.0`, 151,378,177 parameters) - **Logit Capacity**: 25 candidate slots (24 substantive options + 1 explicit abstention slot) 1. **Non-Autoregressive Single Pass**: Evaluates all candidate options simultaneously in a single forward pass (< 35ms latency) without token generation loops. 2. **Proper Scoring Calibration**: Trained with composite Cross-Entropy + Brier Score loss: $$\mathcal{L}_{\text{total}} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{CE}} + 1.0 \times \mathcal{L}_{\text{Brier}}$$ followed by post-hoc L-BFGS temperature scaling ($T = 1.0716$). 3. **Explicit Abstention Route**: Dedicated `__insufficient_evidence__` candidate slot ensures calibrated rejection on out-of-distribution or insufficient context queries. 4. **Edge and In-Browser WebGPU**: Runs locally in browsers via WebGPU/WASM and on servers via PyTorch/ONNX Runtime.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗