AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,836 model profiles13097 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 11

Discover models worth your attention

bern2-ner

dmis-lab

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

🚀 Med-PRM-Reward is among the first Process Reward Models (PRMs) specifically designed for the medical domain. Unlike conventional PRMs, it enhances its verification capabilities by integrating clinical knowledge through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Med-PRM-Reward demonstrates exceptional performance in scaling-test-time computation, particularly outperforming majority‐voting ensembles on complex medical reasoning tasks. Moreover, its scalability is not limited to Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct: it delivers similarly outstanding results in scaling-test-time computation across multiple other medical‐specialized models. Notably, when combined with llama-3-meerkat-8b-v1.0, it became the first 8B model framework to surpass a score of 80 on the MedQA (4-option) benchmark. 📄 Paper: Med-PRM-Reward: Medical Reasoning Models with Stepwise, Guideline‑verified Process Rewards Across seven medical benchmarks, we conducted scaling‐test‐time computation using solutions generated by the Med-PRM-policy model, evaluating 64 solutions per question.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

UltraBERT is a family of English bidirectional encoders with a native 32K context that reach state of the art on both classification and retrieval, two task families on which previous encoders had to choose a side. UltraBERT is supported natively in `transformers >= 5.20`. On earlier 5.x versions (tested with 5.16.1), pass `trust_remote_code=True`. FlashAttention 2 is recommended for long inputs; SDPA and eager attention are also supported. We recommend starting from the settings used in the paper. For classification: AdamW (β1 0.9, β2 0.98, ε 1e-6), weight decay 0.1, a linear schedule with 5% warm-up, and a learning rate swept over {5e-6,8e-6,1e-5,3e-5,5e-5,8e-5}. For dense retrieval: mean pooling with a contrastive loss and a wider learning-rate sweep of {1e-5,3e-5,5e-5,8e-5,1e-4,2e-4,3e-4,5e-4,8e-4,1e-3}.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

UltraBERT is a family of English bidirectional encoders with a native 32K context that reach state of the art on both classification and retrieval, two task families on which previous encoders had to choose a side. UltraBERT is supported natively in `transformers >= 5.20`. On earlier 5.x versions (tested with 5.16.1), pass `trust_remote_code=True`. FlashAttention 2 is recommended for long inputs; SDPA and eager attention are also supported. We recommend starting from the settings used in the paper. For classification: AdamW (β1 0.9, β2 0.98, ε 1e-6), weight decay 0.1, a linear schedule with 5% warm-up, and a learning rate swept over {5e-6,8e-6,1e-5,3e-5,5e-5,8e-5}. For dense retrieval: mean pooling with a contrastive loss and a wider learning-rate sweep of {1e-5,3e-5,5e-5,8e-5,1e-4,2e-4,3e-4,5e-4,8e-4,1e-3}.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗