AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,991 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 1

Discover models worth your attention

**English summary.** A 4-step, CFG-free adapter for OpenMOSS-Team/MOSS-Image-SFT (50 steps × 2 forwards with CFG 3). It continues lodestones/MOSS-Image-SFT-8-steps-dmd (data-space DMD, arXiv 2610.12102) restricted to 4 iterations, trained with DMAD (arXiv 2610.02188): a LoRA critic on the frozen teacher separates teacher samples from student samples, and the student minimises the negative critic logit. DiT time per 1024² image on one H100: 16.2 s (teacher) → 0.81 s. Compared with the lodestones checkpoint run for 4 steps, images have more detail and livelier composition, with some regressions (see Results). Same file format and sampler as the lodestones checkpoint; `inference.py` runs it with the release pipeline. Training code is in `code/`. MOSS-Image-SFT(50 ステップ・CFG 3 で 1 枚 100 回の DiT 計算)を、**4 回の計算・CFG なし**で画像を出せるようにする高速化アダプタです。 lodestones の 8 ステップ版(data-space DMD、update 2600)を出発点に、4 ステップに絞って DMAD で追加学習しました。 カスタムノード `comfyui/rapid-moss/` を同梱しています。ComfyUI 本体も MOSS-Image に対応していますが、専用サンプラーと time path の置き換えはなく、標準の `LoraLoaderModelOnly` は LoRA を bf16 の重みに足し込みます(当たる差分の相対誤差 81%)。標準ノードだけでも絵は出ますが、学習した生成器とは別物になります(下の比較)。このノードを使ってください。

Input Text→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗