AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,991 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 14

Discover models worth your attention

**We recommend `ThinkingCap-gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-MXFP4_MOE.gguf` over `Q4_K_M` at this size**: it is the file evaluated below, and it held up better on our math benchmarks. Pull it with `-hf bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:MXFP4_MOE`. GGUF / llama.cpp quantizations of bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-gemma-4-26B-A4B-it — ThinkingCap's shorter-thinking post-training applied to gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, a mixture-of-experts model with image input. ➡️ Full model description, evaluation results, the measured thinking-token reduction and recommended sampling: see the main model card at bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-gemma-4-26B-A4B-it.

Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

GGUF / llama.cpp quantizations of bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B — the ThinkingCap finetune of Qwen3.8-27B that cuts reasoning tokens by 37% on average while holding 85.8% average accuracy against the base model's 86.6%. ➡️ Full model description, evaluation results (multi-seed, statistically tested), the measured thinking-token reduction, recommended sampling params, and citation: see the main model card at bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B. The low-bit files are built with an **importance matrix** (activation statistics from a chat-templated calibration corpus) and a **per-tensor precision layout**: the attention projections of the full-attention layers and the linear-attention output projections stay at 6–8 bit while the feed-forward weights take the 4-bit hit.

Text generationOpen weights
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

A **14.3 GB** GGUF of bottlecapai/ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B that runs on an **18 GB GPU with image input, MTP speculative decoding and a 32k-token context all on the card**, and matched the bf16 weights on all five benchmarks we evaluated (2,863 questions: 81.00% against 81.03%). The standard GGUFs (ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF) start at IQ4_XS, 15.5 GB, which with the vision projector and a 32k context does not fit 18 GB. Every weight tensor was quantized with llama.cpp's own types (IQ2_S up to Q8_0, all with one importance matrix computed on the model's own reasoning traces). Which type each of the 401 language-model weight matrices gets was then picked by an RCO search: it minimizes the KL divergence between the bf16 model's and the mixed model's next-token distributions on 256 of the model's own traces, under an exact file-size budget. The same idea as ISTA-DASLab's GSQ-RCO GGUFs, searched on this finetune rather than the base model; the rounding itself is llama.cpp's.

Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗