AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,938 model profiles13161 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 3

Discover models worth your attention

heBERT

avichr

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

HeBERT is a Hebrew pretrained language model. It is based on Google's BERT architecture and it is BERT-Base config. HeBert was trained on three dataset: 1. A Hebrew version of OSCAR: ~9.8 GB of data, including 1 billion words and over 20.8 millions sentences. 2. A Hebrew dump of Wikipedia: ~650 MB of data, including over 63 millions words and 3.8 millions sentences 3. Emotion User Generated Content (UGC) data that was collected for the purpose of this study (described below). The ability of the model to classify named entities in text, such as persons' names, organizations, and locations; tested on a labeled dataset from Ben Mordecai and M Elhadad (2005), and evaluated with F1-score.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

HeBERT is a Hebrew pre-trained language model. It is based on Google's BERT architecture and it is BERT-Base config (Devlin et al. 2018). HeBert was trained on three datasets: 1. A Hebrew version of OSCAR (Ortiz, 2019): ~9.8 GB of data, including 1 billion words and over 20.8 million sentences. 2. A Hebrew dump of Wikipedia: ~650 MB of data, including over 63 million words and 3.8 million sentences 3. Emotion UGC data was collected for the purpose of this study. (described below) We evaluated the model on emotion recognition and sentiment analysis, for downstream tasks. Our User-Generated Content (UGC) is comments written on articles collected from 3 major news sites, between January 2020 to August 2020, Total data size of ~150 MB of data, including over 7 million words and 350K sentences. 4000 sentences annotated by crowd members (3-10 annotators per sentence) for 8 emotions (anger, disgust, expectation, fear, happy, sadness, surprise, and trust) and overall sentiment/polarity In order to validate the annotation, we search for an agreement between raters to emotion in each sentence using Krippendorff's alpha (krippendorff, 1970). We left sentences that got alpha > 0.7. Note that while we found a general agreement between raters about emotions like happiness, trust, and disgust, there are few emotions with general disagreement about them, apparently given the complexity of finding them in the text (e.g. expectation and surprise).

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗