AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,991 model profiles13202 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 13

Discover models worth your attention

BiRefNet

ZhengPeng7

Peng Zheng 1,4,5,6 ,  Dehong Gao 2 ,  Deng-Ping Fan 1* ,  Li Liu 3 ,  Jorma Laaksonen 4 ,  Wanli Ouyang 5 ,  Nicu Sebe 6 1 Nankai University  2 Northwestern Polytechnical University  3 National University of Defense Technology  4 Aalto University  5 Shanghai AI Laboratory  6 University of Trento                     

Text generationOpen weights
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

BiRefNet-DIS5K

ZhengPeng7

Peng Zheng 1,4,5,6 ,  Dehong Gao 2 ,  Deng-Ping Fan 1* ,  Li Liu 3 ,  Jorma Laaksonen 4 ,  Wanli Ouyang 5 ,  Nicu Sebe 6 1 Nankai University  2 Northwestern Polytechnical University  3 National University of Defense Technology  4 Aalto University  5 Shanghai AI Laboratory  6 University of Trento  **Check the main BiRefNet model repo for more info and how to use it:** https://huggingface.co/ZhengPeng7/BiRefNet/blob/main/README.md

Input Image→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

> An arbitrary shape adaptable BiRefNet for general segmentation. > This model was trained on arbitrary shapes (256x256 ~ 2304x2304) and shows great robustness on inputs with any shape. > How it looks when compared with BiRefNet-general (fixed 1024x1024 resolution) -- greater than BiRefNet-general and BiRefNet_HR-general on the reserved validation sets (DIS-VD and TE-P3M-500-NP). > The `dynamic_XXxXX` means this BiRefNet_dynamic model was being tested in various input resolutions for the evaluation. For performance of different epochs, check the eval_results-xxx folder for it on my google drive.

Input Image→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

BiRefNet_HR

ZhengPeng7

> This BiRefNet was trained with images in `2048x2048` for higher resolution inference. > All tested in FP16 mode. Peng Zheng 1,4,5,6 ,  Dehong Gao 2 ,  Deng-Ping Fan 1* ,  Li Liu 3 ,  Jorma Laaksonen 4 ,  Wanli Ouyang 5 ,  Nicu Sebe 6 1 Nankai University  2 Northwestern Polytechnical University  3 National University of Defense Technology  4 Aalto University  5 Shanghai AI Laboratory  6 University of Trento 

Input Image→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

> This BiRefNet was trained with images in `2048x2048` for higher resolution image matting with transparency. > All tested in FP16 mode. Peng Zheng 1,4,5,6 ,  Dehong Gao 2 ,  Deng-Ping Fan 1* ,  Li Liu 3 ,  Jorma Laaksonen 4 ,  Wanli Ouyang 5 ,  Nicu Sebe 6 1 Nankai University  2 Northwestern Polytechnical University  3 National University of Defense Technology  4 Aalto University  5 Shanghai AI Laboratory  6 University of Trento 

Input Image→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

BiRefNet_lite

ZhengPeng7

Peng Zheng 1,4,5,6 ,  Dehong Gao 2 ,  Deng-Ping Fan 1* ,  Li Liu 3 ,  Jorma Laaksonen 4 ,  Wanli Ouyang 5 ,  Nicu Sebe 6 1 Nankai University  2 Northwestern Polytechnical University  3 National University of Defense Technology  4 Aalto University  5 Shanghai AI Laboratory  6 University of Trento                   

Input Image→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Peng Zheng 1,4,5,6 ,  Dehong Gao 2 ,  Deng-Ping Fan 1* ,  Li Liu 3 ,  Jorma Laaksonen 4 ,  Wanli Ouyang 5 ,  Nicu Sebe 6 1 Nankai University  2 Northwestern Polytechnical University  3 National University of Defense Technology  4 Aalto University  5 Shanghai AI Laboratory  6 University of Trento                   

Input Image→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Peng Zheng 1,4,5,6 ,  Dehong Gao 2 ,  Deng-Ping Fan 1* ,  Li Liu 3 ,  Jorma Laaksonen 4 ,  Wanli Ouyang 5 ,  Nicu Sebe 6 1 Nankai University  2 Northwestern Polytechnical University  3 National University of Defense Technology  4 Aalto University  5 Shanghai AI Laboratory  6 University of Trento                   

Input Image→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗