AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,440 model profiles13003 providers / publishers45 capability categories464 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 1

Discover models worth your attention

> **TL;DR:** SPARSEUP is a strong and efficient sparse retriever trained on the same backbone family and fine-tuning data as DenseOn / LateOn (149M, ModernBERT). Strongest public vocabulary-based sparse encoder we know of under 150M on BEIR-13 (56.4 nDCG@10). Apache 2.0. Use it! LightOn released open data and a recipe to train **DenseOn** (single-vector) and **LateOn** (late interaction). **SPARSEUP** fills the missing slot: a learned sparse embedding model, so the three architectures can be compared with backbone and data held fixed. The model is initialized from `LateOn-unsupervised` with ModernBERT’s MLM `head` / `decoder.bias` grafted on (`decoder.weight` stays tied to LateOn embeddings). Contrastive fine-tuning on LightOn’s mixture (7 hard negatives sampled from 50, plus in-batch). No cross-encoder distillation. Three extra knobs *vs* vanilla SPLADE-like model: 1. **`logit_shift=15`** — `log(1 + ReLU(x − 15))` so ReLU support starts sparse 2. **`position_top_k=12`** — each token keeps 12 vocab dims max before pooling (expansion budget) 3. **`vocab_fold=case_space`** — fold case / `Ġ` surface forms onto one id after pooling (avoid duplication of surface forms = improve efficiency). Voc goes from 50*k* to ~34*k*.

Input Text→ Output Embedding
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗