THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Explore AI models 2

Provider Input Output License

Discover models worth your attention

Drama-3-GGUF

Jmica

Experimental native audio.cpp conversions of Fish Audio Drama 3, prepared from checkpoint revision `dd64a85cd82e9521f7202610ede97b367fc83946`. All packages use the same trained model architecture and checkpoint. **Standard GGML K-quants with mixed precision.** The packages use Q2_K, Q3_K_S and Q4_K_S file profiles with pure expert banks and explicit precision overrides. Routed expert tensors use Q2_K, Q3_K and Q4_K storage respectively. `backbone-8bit` means Q8_0 language-backbone matrices; `backbone-4bit` means Q4_K matrices with a Q4_0 text embedding. The table below lists the precision overrides. Audio-tower matrices and waveform codec weights remain FP16; audio-tower normalization and other retained FP32 vectors are unchanged. The Q3_K_S and Q4_K_S file profiles use pure expert banks: all 120 routed expert projection banks have uniform Q3_K or Q4_K storage. Their storage-type selection corresponds to a standard `--pure` K profile with explicit precision overrides for the dense backbone, text embedding and audio components. Architecture-specific higher-bit promotion heuristics are not applied; an unmodified default llama.cpp preset can choose different types for some tensors. See the standard converter's pure and per-tensor options. The native audio.cpp converter takes `--expert-type q3_k` or `--expert-type q4_k`. The table above lists each component's actual storage type.

Speech synthesis

Input Text→ Output Audio

Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately

View details ↗

CompareSource / docs ↗

VibeVoice7B

Jmica

基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending

Input Not verified→ Output Not verified

Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately

View details ↗

CompareSource / docs ↗

COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

Monthly input tokens 10 MMonthly output tokens 2 M1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ

How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.