AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
82,722 model profiles12788 providers / publishers45 capability categories464 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 47

Discover models worth your attention

This model is a fine-tuned version of bert-base-uncased on the **GLUE MRPC dataset**. The GLUE MRPC dataset, from The Microsoft Research Paraphrase Corpus (Dolan & Brockett, 2005) is a corpus of sentence pairs automatically extracted from online news sources, with human annotations for whether the sentences in the pair are semantically equivalent. It is a pretrained model on English language using a masked language modeling (MLM) objective. It was introduced in this paper BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. This model, bert-base-uncased-mrpc, is uncased: it does not make a difference between **"english"** and **"English"**. Masked language modeling predicts a masked token in a sequence, and the model can attend to tokens bidirectionally. This means the model has full access to the tokens on the left and right. Masked language modeling is great for tasks that require a good contextual understanding of an entire sequence. BERT is an example of a masked language model. For this model, you don’t need labels (also known as an unsupervised task) because the next word (MLM) is the label BERT base model (uncased) It provides: - Masked language modeling (MLM): taking a sentence, the model randomly masks 15% of the words in the input then run the entire masked sentence through the model and has to predict the masked words. This is different from traditional recurrent neural networks (RNNs) that usually see the words one after the other, or from autoregressive models like GPT which internally masks the future tokens. It allows the model to learn a bidirectional representation of the sentence. - Next sentence prediction (NSP): the models concatenates two masked sentences as inputs during pretraining. Sometimes they correspond to sentences that were next to each other in the original text, sometimes not. The model then has to predict if the two sentences were following each other or not.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Dense Prediction Transformer (DPT) model trained on 1.4 million images for monocular depth estimation. It was introduced in the paper Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction by Ranftl et al. (2021) and first released in this repository. DPT uses the Vision Transformer (ViT) as backbone and adds a neck + head on top for monocular depth estimation. This repository hosts the "hybrid" version of the model as stated in the paper. DPT-Hybrid diverges from DPT by using ViT-hybrid as a backbone and taking some activations from the backbone. The model card has been written in combination by the Hugging Face team and Intel.

Input Image→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

Dense Prediction Transformer (DPT) model trained on 1.4 million images for monocular depth estimation. It was introduced in the paper Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction by Ranftl et al. (2021) and first released in this repository. DPT uses the Vision Transformer (ViT) as backbone and adds a neck + head on top for monocular depth estimation. In case you want to implement the entire logic yourself, here's how to do that for zero-shot depth estimation on an image: Table 1. Comparison to the state of the art on monocular depth estimation. We evaluate zero-shot cross-dataset transfer according to the protocol defined in [30]. Relative performance is computed with respect to the original MiDaS model [30]. Lower is better for all metrics. (Ranftl et al., 2021)

Input Image→ Output Image
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is an int4 model with group_size 128 and symmetric quantization of google/gemma-4-31B-it generated by intel/auto-round. Please follow the license of the original model. A youtube video by Fahd Mirza demonstrates how to use this model. MODEL_ID = "Intel/gemma-4-31B-it-int4-AutoRound" processor = AutoProcessor.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID) model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( MODEL_ID, dtype="auto", device_map="auto" )

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text · Image→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is a fine-tuned 7B parameter LLM on the Intel Gaudi 2 processor from the Intel/neural-chat-7b-v3-1 on the meta-math/MetaMathQA dataset. The model was aligned using the Direct Performance Optimization (DPO) method with Intel/orca_dpo_pairs. The Intel/neural-chat-7b-v3-1 was originally fine-tuned from mistralai/Mistral-7B-v-0.1. For more information, refer to the blog The Practice of Supervised Fine-tuning and Direct Preference Optimization on Intel Gaudi2. Context length for this model: 8192 tokens (same as https://huggingface.co/mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1) Here is the sample code to reproduce the model: GitHub sample code. Here is the documentation to reproduce building the model:

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

This model is an int4 model with group_size 128 and symmetric quantization of Qwen/Qwen2-0.5B-Instruct generated by intel/auto-round algorithm. ⚠️ Important: This model is used for internal testing with VLLM. Please do not delete or modify without approval.

Category pending
Input Not verified→ Output Not verified
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗