AI NEWS · Model intelligenceExplore capabilities. Make informed choices. ↗Profiles indexed first · Details continuously enriched
THE AI MODEL DIRECTORY Start exploring models here

Find your ideal AI model.

From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.

Popular searches
84,836 model profiles13097 providers / publishers45 capability categories465 with comparable prices · 30 benchmarked
TText generation▧Image generation▷Video generation⌘Code generation◖Speech synthesis♫Music generation⬡3D modeling▤Document analysis
DISCOVER & COMPARE

Explore AI models 4

Discover models worth your attention

A 64.8 GB GGUF of Qwen/Qwen3.8-Flash-Next that scores at parity with the full 90 GB quant on tool-calling, GSM8K, and MMLU — 28% smaller, with **zero training and zero transformer surgery**. A 75.4 GB Q4_0 variant of the same cut is also available for older GPUs; see Files. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next carries a 51B-parameter n-gram hash-embedding table (~29% of total weights): 16 independent hash heads, 8 per n-gram type (bigrams / trigrams), injected at layer 1. This model keeps **1 head of 8 per n-gram type** and drops the other 14, exploiting the built-in redundancy of multi-head hashing (each n-gram is looked up several independent ways; a Bloom-filter-style safety margin). Every other tensor is copied **byte-for-byte** from unsloth's UD-Q3_K_XL dynamic quant, so unsloth's imatrix calibration is preserved exactly. The Q4_0 build is **bigger**, not smaller. The n-gram table is what makes this model compact; Q4_0 simply stores every other tensor at more bits than Q3_K_XL does. You are buying throughput with VRAM. On gfx906 that trade is usually worth it — Q4_0 reaches llama.cpp's MMVQ path while K-quants and IQ4_NL fall through to a generic dequant path several times slower.

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗

titler

Cyronius

基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。

Basic profile indexed · More details to follow

Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗
COST EXPLORER

Great models. Clear costs.

Cost analysis

Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.

1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel

Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.

MODEL HANDBOOK

Understand before you choose

Selection guide & FAQ
How should API prices be compared?+

Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.

Do open weights mean free commercial use?+

Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.

Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+

Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.

AI NEWS · From information to decisions

Follow trends. Find tools. Explore models.

Explore AI news ↗Discover AI tools ↗