基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Explore AI models 1757
Remek_basal-omni-1.0-ultra-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Replete-Coder-Llama3-8B-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Replete-Coder-Qwen2-1.5b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Replete-Coder-V2-Llama-3.1-8b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Replete-LLM-Mist-Nemo-12b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Replete-LLM-Qwen2-7b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Replete-LLM-V2.5-Qwen-0.5b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Replete-LLM-V2.5-Qwen-1.5b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Replete-LLM-V2.5-Qwen-14b-GGUF
bartowskiSome of these quants (Q3_K_XL, Q4_K_L etc) are the standard quantization method with the embeddings and output weights quantized to Q8_0 instead of what they would normally default to. Some say that this improves the quality, others don't notice any difference. If you use these models PLEASE COMMENT with your findings. I would like feedback that these are actually used and useful so I don't keep uploading quants no one is using. If the model is bigger than 50GB, it will have been split into multiple files. In order to download them all to a local folder, run:
Replete-LLM-V2.5-Qwen-32b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Replete-LLM-V2.5-Qwen-3b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Replete-LLM-V2.5-Qwen-72b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Replete-LLM-V2.5-Qwen-7b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Replete-LLM-V2-Llama-3.1-8b-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
ReWiz-Qwen-2.5-14B-GGUF
bartowski基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
RinggAI_ringg-router-e2b-GGUF
bartowski**Model details:** - Parameter count: 5B (source checkpoint) - Input support: text, image and audio (with mmproj file) - details - Speculative decoding: no - imatrix: yes - details **Don't know which to choose?** Grab Q4_K_M (3.17GB) - usually a good mix of size and performance. Download instructions available here These quants were made with llama.cpp release b11259 - if this model's architecture is newly supported, you'll need that release or newer to run them.
Rocinante-12B-v1.1-GGUF
bartowskiSome of these quants (Q3_K_XL, Q4_K_L etc) are the standard quantization method with the embeddings and output weights quantized to Q8_0 instead of what they would normally default to. Some say that this improves the quality, others don't notice any difference. If you use these models PLEASE COMMENT with your findings. I would like feedback that these are actually used and useful so I don't keep uploading quants no one is using. If the model is bigger than 50GB, it will have been split into multiple files. In order to download them all to a local folder, run:
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录,详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
No matching models
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
Great models. Clear costs.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
Understand before you choose
How should API prices be compared?+
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Do open weights mean free commercial use?+
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.