From language to images, open weights to APIs. Understand capabilities and compare real costs.
Find the right engine for your next idea.
for 5 epochs with a batch size of 32, a learning rate of 2e-05, and a maximum sequence length of 128. Since this was a classification task, the model was trained with a cross-entropy loss function. The best score the model achieved on this task was 0.850431447746884, as measured by the eval set accuracy, found after 1 epoch.
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
This is an instance of bert-base-multilingual-cased that was fine-tuned on binary toxicity classification task based on our updated (2025) dataset textdetox/multilingual_toxicity_dataset. The model is prepared for TextDetox 2025 Shared Task evaluation.
This is an instance of cardiffnlp/twitter-xlm-roberta-large-2022 that was fine-tuned on binary toxicity classification task based on our updated (2025) dataset textdetox/multilingual_toxicity_dataset.
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
This is an instance of xlm-roberta-large that was fine-tuned on binary toxicity classification task based on our updated (2025) dataset textdetox/multilingual_toxicity_dataset.
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
General Text Embeddings (GTE) model. Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learning The GTE models are trained by Alibaba DAMO Academy. They are mainly based on the BERT framework and currently offer three different sizes of models, including GTE-large, GTE-base, and GTE-small. The GTE models are trained on a large-scale corpus of relevance text pairs, covering a wide range of domains and scenarios. This enables the GTE models to be applied to various downstream tasks of text embeddings, including **information retrieval**, **semantic textual similarity**, **text reranking**, etc. We compared the performance of the GTE models with other popular text embedding models on the MTEB benchmark. For more detailed comparison results, please refer to the MTEB leaderboard.
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
A Vision Transformer (ViT) image feature model. Pretrained on LVD-142M with self-supervised DINOv2 method. - **Model Type:** Image classification / feature backbone - **Model Stats:** - Params (M): 86.6 - GMACs: 151.7 - Activations (M): 397.6 - Image size: 518 x 518 - **Papers:** - DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07193 - An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929v2 - **Original:** https://github.com/facebookresearch/dinov2 - **Pretrain Dataset:** LVD-142M Explore the dataset and runtime metrics of this model in timm model results.
A Vision Transformer (ViT) image feature model. Pretrained on LVD-142M with self-supervised DINOv2 method. - **Model Type:** Image classification / feature backbone - **Model Stats:** - Params (M): 22.1 - GMACs: 46.8 - Activations (M): 198.8 - Image size: 518 x 518 - **Papers:** - DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervision: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07193 - An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929v2 - **Original:** https://github.com/facebookresearch/dinov2 - **Pretrain Dataset:** LVD-142M Explore the dataset and runtime metrics of this model in timm model results.
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
ONNX export of Davlan/xlm-roberta-base-ner-hrl for use with ONNX Runtime, Transformers.js, and bridge-anonymization.
This model is a fine-tuned version of microsoft/deberta-v3-large on the tner/ontonotes5 dataset. Model fine-tuning is done via T-NER's hyper-parameter search (see the repository for more detail). It achieves the following results on the test set: - F1 (micro): 0.9069623608411381 - Precision (micro): 0.902100360312857 - Recall (micro): 0.9118770542773386 - F1 (macro): 0.834586960779896 - Precision (macro): 0.8237351069457466 - Recall (macro): 0.8475169311172334 The per-entity breakdown of the F1 score on the test set are below: - cardinal_number: 0.853475935828877 - date: 0.8815545959284392 - event: 0.8030303030303031 - facility: 0.7896678966789669 - geopolitical_area: 0.9650033867690223 - group: 0.9337209302325581 - language: 0.8372093023255814 - law: 0.6756756756756757 - location: 0.7624020887728459 - money: 0.8818897637795275 - ordinal_number: 0.8635235732009926 - organization: 0.914952751528627 - percent: 0.9 - person: 0.9609866599546942 - product: 0.7901234567901234 - quantity: 0.8161434977578474 - time: 0.674364896073903 - work_of_art: 0.7188405797101449 For F1 scores, the confidence interval is obtained by bootstrap as below: - F1 (micro): - 90%: [0.9019409960743083, 0.911751130722053] - 95%: [0.9010822890967028, 0.9125611412371442] - F1 (macro): - 90%: [0.9019409960743083, 0.911751130722053] - 95%: [0.9010822890967028, 0.9125611412371442]
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
This model is a fine-tuned version of roberta-large on the tner/tweetner7 dataset (`train_all` split). Model fine-tuning is done via T-NER's hyper-parameter search (see the repository for more detail). It achieves the following results on the test set of 2021: - F1 (micro): 0.6574551220340903 - Precision (micro): 0.644212629008989 - Recall (micro): 0.6712534690101758 - F1 (macro): 0.6124665667529737 - Precision (macro): 0.6005167968535563 - Recall (macro): 0.625251837701222 The per-entity breakdown of the F1 score on the test set are below: - corporation: 0.5392156862745098 - creative_work: 0.4760582928521859 - event: 0.4673321234119782 - group: 0.6139798488664987 - location: 0.6707399864222675 - person: 0.8293212669683258 - product: 0.6906187624750498 For F1 scores, the confidence interval is obtained by bootstrap as below: - F1 (micro): - 90%: [0.6484148010152769, 0.6672289519134409] - 95%: [0.6470100684797441, 0.6689850350992637] - F1 (macro): - 90%: [0.6484148010152769, 0.6672289519134409] - 95%: [0.6470100684797441, 0.6689850350992637]
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.
