roberta-base-imdb
aychang基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗DISCOVER & COMPARE
Explore AI models 2428
arabic-medical-classifier-arabertv2
AymanElbery基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗anonymizer-beto-cased-flair
aymurai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗flair-ner-spanish-judicial
aymurai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗BERT-Emotions-Classifier
ayoubkirouane基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗prediksi-emosi-indobert
azizp128基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗bge-base-en
BAAI**Recommend switching to newest BAAI/bge-base-en-v1.5, which has more reasonable similarity distribution and same method of usage.** Model List | FAQ | Usage | Evaluation | Train | Contact | Citation | License More details please refer to our Github: FlagEmbedding.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗bge-base-en-v1.5
BAAIIf you are looking for a model that supports more languages, longer texts, and other retrieval methods, you can try using bge-m3. All models have been uploaded to Huggingface Hub, and you can see them at https://huggingface.co/BAAI. If you cannot open the Huggingface Hub, you also can download the models at https://model.baai.ac.cn/models . Following this example to prepare data and fine-tune your model. Some suggestions: - Mine hard negatives following this example, which can improve the retrieval performance. - If you pre-train bge on your data, the pre-trained model cannot be directly used to calculate similarity, and it must be fine-tuned with contrastive learning before computing similarity. - If the accuracy of the fine-tuned model is still not high, it is recommended to use/fine-tune the cross-encoder model (bge-reranker) to re-rank top-k results. Hard negatives also are needed to fine-tune reranker.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗If you are looking for a model that supports more languages, longer texts, and other retrieval methods, you can try using bge-m3. All models have been uploaded to Huggingface Hub, and you can see them at https://huggingface.co/BAAI. If you cannot open the Huggingface Hub, you also can download the models at https://model.baai.ac.cn/models . Following this example to prepare data and fine-tune your model. Some suggestions: - Mine hard negatives following this example, which can improve the retrieval performance. - If you pre-train bge on your data, the pre-trained model cannot be directly used to calculate similarity, and it must be fine-tuned with contrastive learning before computing similarity. - If the accuracy of the fine-tuned model is still not high, it is recommended to use/fine-tune the cross-encoder model (bge-reranker) to re-rank top-k results. Hard negatives also are needed to fine-tune reranker.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗bge-m3
BAAIIn this project, we introduce BGE-M3, which is distinguished for its versatility in Multi-Functionality, Multi-Linguality, and Multi-Granularity. - Multi-Functionality: It can simultaneously perform the three common retrieval functionalities of embedding model: dense retrieval, multi-vector retrieval, and sparse retrieval. - Multi-Linguality: It can support more than 100 working languages. - Multi-Granularity: It is able to process inputs of different granularities, spanning from short sentences to long documents of up to 8192 tokens. We recommend to use the following pipeline: hybrid retrieval + re-ranking. - Hybrid retrieval leverages the strengths of various methods, offering higher accuracy and stronger generalization capabilities. A classic example: using both embedding retrieval and the BM25 algorithm. Now, you can try to use BGE-M3, which supports both embedding and sparse retrieval. This allows you to obtain token weights (similar to the BM25) without any additional cost when generate dense embeddings. To use hybrid retrieval, you can refer to Vespa and Milvus. The previous test results were lower because we mistakenly removed the passages that have the same id as the query from the search results. After correcting this mistake, the overall performance of BGE-M3 on MIRACL is higher than the previous results, but the experimental conclusion remains unchanged. The other results are not affected by this mistake. To reproduce the previous lower results, you need to add the `--remove-query` parameter when using `pyserini.search.faiss` or `pyserini.search.lucene` to search the passages.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗**We have updated the new reranker, supporting larger lengths, more languages, and achieving better performance.** Model List | FAQ | Usage | Evaluation | Train | Citation | License **More details please refer to our Github: FlagEmbedding.**
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗**More details please refer to our Github: FlagEmbedding.** - Model List - Usage - Fine-tuning - Evaluation - Citation Different from embedding model, reranker uses question and document as input and directly output similarity instead of embedding. You can get a relevance score by inputting query and passage to the reranker. And the score can be mapped to a float value in [0,1] by sigmoid function.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗**More details please refer to our Github: FlagEmbedding.** - Model List - Usage - Fine-tuning - Evaluation - Citation Different from embedding model, reranker uses question and document as input and directly output similarity instead of embedding. You can get a relevance score by inputting query and passage to the reranker. And the score can be mapped to a float value in [0,1] by sigmoid function.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗**More details please refer to our Github: FlagEmbedding.** - Model List - Usage - Fine-tuning - Evaluation - Citation Different from embedding model, reranker uses question and document as input and directly output similarity instead of embedding. You can get a relevance score by inputting query and passage to the reranker. And the score can be mapped to a float value in [0,1] by sigmoid function.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗If you are looking for a model that supports more languages, longer texts, and other retrieval methods, you can try using bge-m3. All models have been uploaded to Huggingface Hub, and you can see them at https://huggingface.co/BAAI. If you cannot open the Huggingface Hub, you also can download the models at https://model.baai.ac.cn/models . Following this example to prepare data and fine-tune your model. Some suggestions: - Mine hard negatives following this example, which can improve the retrieval performance. - If you pre-train bge on your data, the pre-trained model cannot be directly used to calculate similarity, and it must be fine-tuned with contrastive learning before computing similarity. - If the accuracy of the fine-tuned model is still not high, it is recommended to use/fine-tune the cross-encoder model (bge-reranker) to re-rank top-k results. Hard negatives also are needed to fine-tune reranker.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗Model List | FAQ | Usage | Evaluation | Train | Contact | Citation | License More details please refer to our Github: FlagEmbedding. FlagEmbedding can map any text to a low-dimensional dense vector which can be used for tasks like retrieval, classification, clustering, or semantic search. And it also can be used in vector databases for LLMs.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗wikineural-multilingual-ner
BabelscapeThis is the model card for the EMNLP 2021 paper WikiNEuRal: Combined Neural and Knowledge-based Silver Data Creation for Multilingual NER. We fine-tuned a multilingual language model (mBERT) for 3 epochs on our WikiNEuRal dataset for Named Entity Recognition (NER). The resulting multilingual NER model supports the 9 languages covered by WikiNEuRal (de, en, es, fr, it, nl, pl, pt, ru), and it was trained on all 9 languages jointly. The original repository for the paper can be found at https://github.com/Babelscape/wikineural. This model is trained on WikiNEuRal, a state-of-the-art dataset for Multilingual NER automatically derived from Wikipedia. Therefore, it might not generalize well to all textual genres (e.g. news). On the other hand, models trained only on news articles (e.g. only on CoNLL03) have been proven to obtain much lower scores on encyclopedic articles. To obtain more robust systems, we encourage you to train a system on the combination of WikiNEuRal with other datasets (e.g. WikiNEuRal + CoNLL).
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗FinBERT_market_based
baptle基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗> **A newer, better version is available: bardsai/eu-pii-anonimization-multilang-v2.** > On real web pages, scrapes, PDFs and invoices its strict F1 is 0.973 vs 0.885 for this model, and it is better on every public benchmark we tested (Gretel 0.692 vs 0.615, Nemotron-PII 0.933 vs 0.882, OpenPII 0.997 vs 0.928). Same label set; ONNX and INT8 weights included. New projects should use v2. A multilingual PII detector built for EU compliance reality: 24 official languages, GDPR special categories, AI Act high-risk data - in one model. GDPR and the AI Act require you to detect and redact personal data across every language your users write in. Most open-source PII models were trained on English with a few translations bolted on, and they cover the basics — names, emails, phone numbers — while missing exactly the categories regulators care about: biometric data, genetic data, health information, political opinions, ethnic origin.
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗finance-sentiment-de-base
bardsai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗finance-sentiment-fr-base
bardsai基础档案已收录，详细介绍后续补充。可先查看厂商、分类与来源。
Basic profile indexed · More details to follow
Input Text→ Output Text
Price not verifiedCheck multimodal and channel pricing separately
View details ↗No matching models
Adjust provider, category or input/output filters. New models are added continuously.
COST EXPLORER
Great models. Clear costs.
Adjust monthly token usage to compare estimated API costs.
1 M = 1 million tokens · USD
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Compares base text-token rates within the same channel
Uses collected, comparable USD-per-million-token rates. Snapshots exclude cache discounts, tiers, extra reasoning output and taxes. Check current source prices.
MODEL HANDBOOK
Understand before you choose
How should API prices be compared?+
Separate input, output and cache rates, then estimate the same workload. Image, audio and video rates may use items, duration or resolution rather than tokens.
Do open weights mean free commercial use?+
Not necessarily. Check each version’s license, commercial restrictions and policies. Self-hosting also incurs compute and maintenance costs.
Is the top-ranked model the best for me?+
Rankings depend on tasks, versions and methods. Compare accuracy, latency, reliability and costs on your own workload.